UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [ X ] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Filed by the Registrant
[ X ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
[
]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) [ X ] Definitive Proxy Statement [ ] Definitive Additional Materials [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss. 240.14a-12
[
]
Preliminary Proxy Statement
[
]
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ X
]
Definitive Proxy Statement
[
]
Definitive Additional Materials
[
]
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
--------------------------------- (Name(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Name(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ X ] No fee required. [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: -------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: -------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): -------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: -------------------------------------------------------------- (5) Total fee paid: -------------------------------------------------------------- [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: -------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: -------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Filing Party: -------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Date Filed: --------------------------------------------------------------
[ X
]
No fee required.
[
]
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)
Total fee paid:
[
]
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[
]
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)
Filing Party:
(4)
Date Filed:
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
5205 North
O'ConnorO’Connor BoulevardSuite 200
Irving, Texas 75039
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Pioneer Natural Resources Company:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (the
"Company"“Company”) will be held in theHudsonCottonwood Room at theDallas Marriott Las ColinasFour Seasons Hotel,223 West Las Colinas4150 North MacArthur Boulevard, Irving, Texas75039,75038, onWednesday,Friday, May 16,2007,2008, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (the"Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:1. To elect four Class I directors, each for a term of three years. 2. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the auditors of the the Company for the current year. 3. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Company's Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which will extend the termination date of the plan from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2017. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
1.
To elect four Class II directors, each for a term of three years.
2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the auditors of the Company for 2008.
3.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
These proposals are described in the accompanying proxy materials. You will be able to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March
22, 2007.19, 2008.YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please
date, sign and returnvote over theenclosed Proxyinternet atwww.continentalstock.comor by phone at 1-866-894-0537 promptly so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes and so we may have a quorum at the Annual Meeting.Instead of returning theAlternatively, you may request a paper proxy card, which you mayvotecomplete, sign and return byinternet or phone by following the instructions on your Proxy. By Order of the Board of Directors, /s/ Mark H. Kleinman ------------------------------------ Mark H. Kleinman Secretarymail.
By Order of the Board of Directors.
/s/ Mark H. Kleinman
Mark H. Kleinman
Secretary
Irving, Texas
April 4,
20072008 PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
5205 North
O'ConnorO’Connor BoulevardSuite 200
Irving, Texas 75039
PROXY STATEMENT
20072008 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The Board of Directors of the Company requests your Proxy for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders that will be held
Wednesday,Friday, May 16,2007,2008, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, in theHudsonCottonwood Room at theDallas Marriott Las ColinasFour Seasons Hotel,223 West Las Colinas4150 North MacArthur Boulevard, Irving, Texas75039.75038. By granting the Proxy, you authorize the persons named on the Proxy to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person. If you are not present at the Annual Meeting, your shares may be voted only by a person to whom you have given a proper
Proxy, such as the accompanying Proxy or the InternetProxy. You may revoke the Proxy in writing at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of the revocation, bysigning and delivering to the Secretary of the Company a Proxy with a later date, or bysubmitting your vote electronically through the internet or by phone after the grant of theProxy.Proxy, or by signing and delivering to the Secretary of the Company a Proxy with a later date. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke the Proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company before the Proxy is exercised or unless you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.DELIVERYELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF PROXY
MATERIALS Mailing Date The approximate date on whichSTATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORTAs permitted under the new rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding the internet availability of proxy materials, the Company is making this Proxy Statement and
accompanyingits Annual Report available to its stockholders electronically via the internet. The Company is sending on or about April 4, 2008, a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 19, 2008, which Notice will include (i) instructions on how to access the Company’s proxy materials electronically, (ii) the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting,of Stockholders and Proxy are first being sent or given to stockholders is April 4, 2007. Stockholders Sharing an Address Registered Stockholders. Registered stockholders (the stockholder owns shares in his, her or its own name on the books(iii) a description of theCompany's transfer agent) who sharematters intended to be acted upon at thesame address will be delivered one Proxy Statement and one 2006AnnualReport. Street name Stockholders. Most banks and brokers are delivering only one copyMeeting, (iv) a list of theProxy Statement and the 2006 Annual Report to consenting street name stockholders (thematerials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on how a stockholderowns shares in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record on the books of the Company's transfer agent) who share the same address. This procedure reduces the Company's printing and distribution costs. Those who wishcan request to receiveseparate copies may do so by contacting their bankpaper orbroker. Similarly, most street name stockholders who are receiving multiplee-mail copies of theProxy StatementCompany’s proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and2006instructions on how to access the proxy card, and (vii) information about attending the AnnualReportMeeting and voting in person.Stockholders of Record and Beneficial Owners
Most of the Company’s stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholders of Record.If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice is being sent directly to you by our agent. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners.If your shares are held in a
single address may requestbrokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice will be forwarded to you by your broker or nominee. The broker or nominee is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote. Beneficial owners thatonly a single setreceive the Notice by mail from the stockholder ofmaterials be sent to themrecord should follow the instructions included in thefuture by contacting their bank or broker. In the alternative, most street name stockholders may give instructionsNotice toreceive separate copies or discontinue multiple mailings of materials by contacting the third party that mails annual meeting materials for most banks and brokers by writing to Householding Department, ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, or telephoning (800) 542-1061. The instructions must include the name of the stockholder's brokerage firm and account number.Electronic Delivery Option Instead of receiving future copies ofview the proxymaterials by mail, registered stockholders may elect to view future proxy materials on the internet by following the instructions provided whenstatement and transmit votingby internet or phone. Street name stockholders may also have the opportunity to view copies of the proxy materials electronically. Those who opt to do so may contact their bank or broker regarding the availability of this service. Opting to view proxy materials online will save the Company the cost of producing and mailing documents to stockholders and provides immediate access to the information. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and other proxy materials are also available on the Company's website at www.pxd.com. Neither the Company website nor any other website included in this Proxy Statement is intended to function as a hyperlink, and the information contained on such websites is not a part of this Proxy Statement.instructions.QUORUM AND VOTING
Voting Stock.The
Company'sCompany’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, is the only class of securities that entitles holders to vote generally at meetings of theCompany'sCompany’s stockholders. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.Record Date.The record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting was the close of business on March
22, 2007.19, 2008. As of the record date,123,386,066119,477,243 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.Quorum and Adjournments.The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of a majority of the
votes eligibleoutstanding shares entitled tobe castvote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.If a quorum is not present, the stockholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by Proxy at the Annual Meeting have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present. At any adjourned Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally notified.
Vote Required.Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes present and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Ratification of the selection of the
Company'sCompany’s auditorswill require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Approval of the Company's Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Planwill require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. An automated system that theCompany'sCompany’s transfer agent administers will tabulate the votes. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are required to vote shares in accordance with instructions received from the beneficial owners. Brokers are permitted to vote on discretionary items if they have not received instructions from the beneficial owners, but they are not permitted to vote (a"broker non-vote"“broker non-vote”) on non-discretionary items absent instructions from the beneficial owner. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count in determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of voting on director elections. For purposes of voting on the ratification of the selection of auditors,and approval of the Company's Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan,abstentions will be included in the number of shares voting and will have the effect of a vote against theproposals,proposal, and broker non-votes will not be included in the number of shares voting and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the voting.2Default Voting.A Proxy that is properly completed and
returnedsubmitted will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the Proxy. If you properly complete andreturnsubmit a Proxy, but do not indicate any contrary voting instructions, your shares will be voted as follows:oFOR the election of the four persons named in this Proxy Statement as the Board of
Directors'Directors’ nominees for election as ClassIII directors.oFOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the
Company'sCompany’s auditors for2007. o FOR the approval of the Company's Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.2008.If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the Proxy. The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than those previously stated, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.
PARTICIPANTS IN THE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 401(k) AND MATCHING PLAN
Participants in the Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. 401(k) and Matching Plan (the
"401(k) Plan"“401(k) Plan”) who have shares of common stock credited to their plan account as of the record date will have the right to direct the 401(k) Plan trustee regarding how to vote those shares. The trustee will vote the shares in aparticipant'sparticipant’s 401(k) Plan account in accordance with theparticipant'sparticipant’s instructions or, if no instructions are received prior to May11, 2007,13, 2008, the shares credited to thatparticipant'sparticipant’s account will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions. Information as to how participants voted the shares credited to their 401(k) Plan account will not be disclosed to the Company.If a participant holds common stock outside of the 401(k) Plan, the participant will
also receive a Proxy relatingneed tothosevote such shareswhich must be votedseparately.ITEM ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals for election as Class
III Directors of the Company with their terms to expire in20102011 when their successors are elected and qualified:James R.
Hartwell Gardner Linda K. Lawson FrankBaroffioEdison C. Buchanan
Scott D. Sheffield
Jim A.
Risch Mark S. SextonWatsonMessrs.
Gardner, RischBaroffio, Buchanan, Sheffield andSexton and Mrs. LawsonWatson are currently serving as Directors of the Company. Their biographical information is contained in the"Directors“Directors and ExecutiveOfficers"Officers” section below.The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the
Company'sCompany’s directors will be reduced or the persons acting under the Proxy will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board of Directors recommends.The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the
nominees. 3nominees .DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The executive officers of the Company are, and after the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the nominees of the Board of Directors as set forth in
"Item“Item One - Election ofDirectors"Directors” above, the Board of Directors of the Company will be:Name Age Position - ---- --- -------- Scott D. Sheffield....... 54 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Name
Age
Position
Scott D. Sheffield
55
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer
Timothy L. Dove.......... 50 President and Chief Operating Officer A. R. Alameddine......... 59 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Negotiations Mark S. Berg .......... 48 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary Chris J. Cheatwood....... 46 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Exploration Richard P. Dealy......... 41 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer William F. Hannes........ 47 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Business Development Danny L. Kellum.......... 52 Executive Vice President, Domestic Operations Darin G. Holderness...... 43 Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary James R. Baroffio........ 75 Director Edison C. Buchanan....... 52 Director R. Hartwell Gardner...... 72 Director Linda K. Lawson.......... 61 Director Andrew D. Lundquist...... 46 Director Charles E. Ramsey, Jr.... 70 Director Frank A. Risch .......... 64 Director Mark S. Sexton .......... 51 Director Robert A. Solberg........ 61 Director Jim A. Watson .......... 68 Director
Timothy L. Dove
51
President and Chief Operating Officer
Mark S. Berg
49
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
Chris J. Cheatwood
47
Executive Vice President, Geoscience
Richard P. Dealy
42
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
William F. Hannes
48
Executive Vice President, Business Development
Danny L. Kellum
53
Executive Vice President, Domestic Operations
David McManus
54
Executive Vice President, International Operations
Jay P. Still
46
Executive Vice President, Domestic Operations
Darin G. Holderness
44
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
James R. Baroffio
76
Director
Edison C. Buchanan
53
Director
R. Hartwell Gardner
73
Director
Linda K. Lawson
62
Director
Andrew D. Lundquist
47
Director
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr.
71
Director
Frank A. Risch
65
Director
Mark S. Sexton
52
Director
Robert A. Solberg
62
Director
Jim A. Watson
69
Director
The Company has classified its Board of Directors into three classes. Directors in each class are elected to serve for three-year terms and until either they are reelected or their successors are elected and qualified. Each year, the directors of one class stand for reelection as their terms of office expire. Messrs. Gardner, Risch and Sexton, and Mrs. Lawson are designated as Class I Directors, and their terms of office expire
at the Annual Meeting.in 2010. Messrs. Baroffio, Buchanan, Sheffield and Watson are designated as Class II Directors, and their terms of office expirein 2008.at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Lundquist, Ramsey and Solberg are designated as Class III Directors, and their terms of office expire in 2009.Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Set forth below is biographical information about each of the
Company'sCompany’s executive officers and directors named above.Scott D. Sheffield.Mr. Sheffield, a distinguished graduate of The University of Texas with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering, has held the position of Chief Executive Officer since August 1997. He was President of the Company from August 1997 to November 2004 and assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors in August 1999. He was the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company,
("a predecessor of the Company (“Parker &Parsley"Parsley”), from October 1990 until the Company was formed in August 1997. Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company("PPDC"(“PPDC”), a predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. Mr. Sheffield served as Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985, when he was elected President and a Director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before joining PPDC, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.4Timothy L.
Dove.Dove. Mr. Dove was elected President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Dove held the positions of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February2000 to November 2004 and Executive Vice President - Business Development from August 1997 to January 2000. Mr. Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in which position he served until August 1997. Before joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy Corp., in various capacities in international exploration and production, marketing, refining, and planning and development. Mr. Dove earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his Master of Business Administration in 1981 from the University of Chicago.
A. R. Alameddine. Mr. Alameddine was elected Executive Vice President - Worldwide Negotiations in November 2005. Mr. Alameddine joined Parker & Parsley (a predecessor of the Company) in July 1997 as Vice President of Domestic Business Development, and continued to serve the Company in this capacity after the Company's formation in August 1997 until he was promoted to Executive Vice President - Worldwide Business Development in November 2003. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Alameddine spent 26 years with Mobil Exploration and Production Company ("Mobil"). At the time of his departure from Mobil, Mr. Alameddine was the Acquisition, Trade and Sales Manager, a position he had held since 1990. Prior to 1990, Mr. Alameddine held several managerial positions in the acquisition and sales group as well as in the reservoir engineering department. A native of Lebanon, Mr. Alameddine joined Mobil as an Operations Engineer following his graduation from Louisiana State University in 1971 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.Mark S. Berg.Mr. Berg was elected Executive Vice President and General Counsel in April 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Berg served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of American General Corporation, a Fortune 200 diversified financial services company, from 1997 through 2002. Subsequent to the sale of American General to American International Group, Inc., Mr. Berg joined Hanover Compressor Company as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. He served in that capacity from May
of2002 through Aprilof2004. Mr. Berg began his career in 1983 with the Houston-based law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. He was a partner with the firm from 1990 through 1997. Mr. Berg graduated Magna Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa with a Bachelor of Arts degree from Tulane University in 1980. He earned his Juris Doctorate with honors from the University of Texas Law School in 1983.Chris J.
Cheatwood.Cheatwood. Mr. Cheatwood was elected Executive Vice President, Geoscience in November of 2007. From January 2002 until November 2007, Mr. Cheatwood served the Company as Executive Vice President - WorldwideExploration in January 2002.Exploration. Mr. Cheatwood joined the Company in August 1997 and was promoted to Vice President - Domestic Exploration in July 1998 and Senior Vice President - Exploration in December 2000. Before joining the Company, Mr. Cheatwood spent ten years with ExxonCorporation where his focus included exploration in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico.Corporation. Mr. Cheatwood is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology and earned his Master of Science degree in Geology from the University of Tulsa.Richard P. Dealy.Mr. Dealy was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Dealy held positions of Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from February 1998 and Vice President and Controller from August 1997 to January 1998. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley in July 1992 and was promoted to Vice President and Controller in 1995, in which position he served until August 1997. He is a Certified Public Accountant, and prior to joining Parker & Parsley, he was employed by KPMG LLP. Mr. Dealy graduated with honors from Eastern New Mexico University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and Finance.
William F. Hannes.Mr. Hannes was elected Executive Vice President - Business Development in December 2007. Prior to that time, Mr. Hannes served the Company as Executive Vice President - Worldwide Business Development
infrom November 2005. Mr. Hannes joined Parker & Parsley(a predecessor of the Company)in July 1997 as Director of Business Development, and continued to serve the Company in this capacity after theCompany'sCompany’s formation in August 1997 until he was promoted to Vice President-– Engineering and Development in June2001.2001, which position he held until November 2005. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr.5Hannes held engineering positions with Mobil and Superior Oil. He graduated from Texas A&M University in 1981 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering. Danny L. Kellum.Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive Vice President - Domestic Operations in May 2000. From January 2000 until May 2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Permian Division from August 1997 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian Division for Parker & Parsley until August 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker & Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil Corporation.
David McManus.Mr. McManus was elected Executive Vice President, International Operations in November 2007. In January 2005, Mr. McManus joined the Company as Vice President, International Operations and continued to serve in that capacity until November 2007. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. McManus was Executive Vice President with the BG Group where he was responsible for developing technical and commercial capabilities and directing assets in the Eastern Hemisphere from April 2000 to October 2004. He also served as President of ARCO Europe from June 1994 to April 2000. Prior to that, Mr. McManus held senior positions with LASMO, Ultramar, Shell and Fluor. Since 2004, Mr. McManus has also served on the Board of Directors for Cape PLC as the Chairman and a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. McManus graduated from Heriott-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland, with a degree in civil engineering.
Jay P. Still. Mr. Still was elected Executive Vice President - Domestic Operations in November 2007. Prior to that time, Mr. Still held the positions of Executive Vice President, Western Division from November 2005, Vice President, Western Division from September 2004 to November 2005, Vice President, Gulf of Mexico from July 2001 to September 2004 and Vice President of Operations for a former subsidiary of the Company located in Argentina from November 1997 to July 2001. Mr. Still joined Parker & Parsley in January 1995 as Director of Engineering Development and continued to serve the Company in this capacity after the Company’s formation in August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Still spent ten years with Mobil in various drilling, operations and reservoir engineering assignments focusing on the Gulf of Mexico before moving into international business development activities. Mr. Still earned his Masters in Business Administration at Loyola University and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University.
Darin G. Holderness.Mr. Holderness graduated with a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Boise State University in 1986. In December 2004, he was elected Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer and various other positions of Basic Energy Services from March 2004 to November 2004. Earlier in his career, he served as Vice President
-– Controller and various other positions with Pure Resources, Inc. and predecessor entities from January 1998 to February 2004. From January 1996 to December 1997, he served as Manager of Financial Reporting for Aquila Gas Pipeline Corporation. From June 1986 to December 1995 he was employed by KPMG LLP as a Senior Manager and various other positions.James R. Baroffio.Dr. Baroffio received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Geology at the College of Wooster, Ohio, a Master of Science in Geology at Ohio State University, and a Ph.D. in Geology and Civil Engineering at the University of Illinois. Before becoming a Director of the Company in December 1997, Dr. Baroffio enjoyed a long career with Chevron Oil Corporation where he served as President, Chevron Research and Technology Center and Vice President of Exploration of Chevron USA and eventually retired as President of Chevron Canada Resources in 1994. Dr. Baroffio was Chairman of the U.S. National Committee of the World Petroleum Congress and is a Trustee Associate of the AAPG Foundation. His community leadership positions included Chairman of the Pacific Symphony of California and a Director of the Nature Conservancy of Canada, as well as serving as President of the Alberta Nature Conservancy.
Edison C. Buchanan.Mr. Buchanan received a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Tulane University in 1977 and a Master of Business Administration in Finance and International Business from Columbia University Graduate School of Business in 1981. From 1981 to 1997, Mr. Buchanan was a Managing Director of various groups in the Investment Banking Division of Dean Witter Reynolds in their New York and Dallas offices. In 1997, Mr. Buchanan joined Morgan Stanley Dean Witter as a Managing Director in the Real Estate Investment Banking group. In 2000, Mr. Buchanan became Managing Director and head of the domestic Real Estate Investment Banking Group of Credit Suisse First Boston. In 2001, Mr. Buchanan began working for The Trust for Public Land, a land conservation organization, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Mr. Buchanan became a Director of the Company in 2002. Since 2004, Mr. Buchanan has also served on the Board of Directors of MFA Mortgage Investments, Inc.
R. Hartwell
Gardner.Gardner. Mr. Gardner became a Director of the Company in August 1997. He served as a Director of Parker & Parsley from November 1995 until August 1997. Mr. Gardner graduated from Colgate University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and then earned a Master of Business Administration from Harvard University. Until October1,1995, Mr. Gardner was the Treasurer of Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobil Corporation from 1974 and 1976, respectively. Mr. Gardner is a member of Financial ExecutivesInternational where he served as Chairman in 1986
and1987and 1987 and is a Director and Chairman of the Investment Committee of Oil Investment Corporation Ltd. and Oil Casualty Investment Corporation Ltd. in Hamilton, Bermuda.Linda K. Lawson.Mrs. Lawson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Denver. Mrs. Lawson was employed by business units of The Williams Companies, as well as the parent organization from 1980 to her retirement in 2001. During her tenure she served in a variety of capacities including accounting and finance positions of the parent, and Controller of a
6Federal Energy Regulatory Commission regulated energy business unit, Vice President of Investor Relations, Vice President of Human Resources, and as Chief Operating Officer of several telecommunication start-up businesses. She is a Certified Public Accountant. She serves on the Strategic Planning and FundingAcademic Excellence Committee for the School of Accountancy at the University of Denver, where she is also an adjunct instructor, and she serves on several outdoor recreational non-profit Denver organizations and is a board member of the Center for Corporate Excellence, a non-profit organization engaged in the pursuit and improvement of corporate ethics and governance. Mrs. Lawson became a Director of the Company in 2002.Andrew D. Lundquist.Mr. Lundquist received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Alaska and a Juris Doctorate from Catholic University Columbus School of Law. He joined the
Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors in September 2004, in accordance with the terms of theCompany'sCompany’s merger with Evergreen Resources, Inc. after having served as an independent director on the Board of Directors of Evergreen Resources, Inc. since November 2002. During 2001, Mr. Lundquist served as the Director of The White House National Energy Policy Development Group, which directed the cabinet-level task force created by the President and headed by the Vice President that produced thePresident'sPresident’s National Energy Policy. At that same time, he also served as Senior Advisor to the President and Vice President on energy issues. Mr. Lundquist was the Majority Staff Director of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee from 1998 to 2001. Since March 2002, Mr. Lundquist has served as the Managing Partner ofLundquist, Nethercutt & Griles,BlueWater Strategies LLC, a Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm that provides analytic and strategic advice to senior executives of corporations. Mr. Lundquist also serves as Director of Coeurd'Alened’Alene Mines Corporation, a company engaged in the operation, ownership, development and exploration of silver and gold mining property.Charles E. Ramsey, Jr.Mr. Ramsey is a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines with a Petroleum Engineering degree and a graduate of the Smaller Company Management program at the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Ramsey has served as a Director of the Company since August 1997. Mr. Ramsey served as a Director of Parker & Parsley from October 1991 until August 1997. Since October 1991, he has operated an independent management and financial consulting firm. From June 1958 until June 1986, Mr. Ramsey held various engineering and management positions in the oil and gas industry and, for six years before October 1991, was a Senior Vice President in the Corporate Finance Department of Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. in its Dallas, Texas office. His industry experience includes 12 years of senior management experience with May Petroleum Inc. in the positions of President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President. Mr. Ramsey is also a former director of MBank Dallas, the Dallas Petroleum Club and Lear Petroleum Corporation.
Frank A. Risch.Mr. Risch
earnedreceived a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration in 1964 from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Science degree in industrial administration in 1966 from Carnegie Mellon University.After joiningMr. Risch joined Exxon Corporation in 1966 as a financial analysthein New York and subsequently held various positions in finance, planning, marketing andmarketinggeneral management with Exxon and its operating affiliates in the U.S. and abroad for nearly 38 years. Mr. Risch retired in 2004 as Vice President and Treasurer (and Principal Financial Officer) of Exxon MobilCorporation in June 2004 andCorporation. He was appointed to theCompany'sCompany’s Board of Directors in August 2005. Heserves onis a member of the Business Board of Advisors of the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University. He is active in civic and community organizations, serving asChairman of the Finance Committee and TreasurerExecutive Vice President (Chairman-Elect) of the Dallas Theater Center and as a member of theBoardBoards ofDirectorsthe Communities Foundation of Texas, the Dallas Center for the Performing Arts and Dallas CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates).Mr. RischHe isalsoa member of the Financial ExecutivesInstitute,International, the World Affairs Council of Greater Dallas and the Dallas Committee on Foreign Relations.Mark S. Sexton.
Mr. Sexton is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Evergreen Energy Inc. (formerly known as KFx, Inc.), which offers combined energy, environmental and economic solutions to coal-fired power generating facilities and industrial coal users in the United States and internationally.Mr. Sexton graduated from Stanford University in 1978 with a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering andiswas registered as a professional engineer in Colorado. He joined theCompany'sCompany’s Board of Directors in September 2004, in accordance with the terms of theCompany'sCompany’s merger with Evergreen Resources, Inc.(which is not affiliated with Mr. Sexton's present employer, Evergreen Energy, 7Inc.).Mr. Sexton was employed in various technical, financial and management positions with Amoco Production Company, Norwest Bank and energy companies specifically targeting coal bed methane development until he joined Evergreen Resources, Inc. in 1989 where he initially managed its daily operating activities. Before Evergreen Resources, Inc. merged with the Company in September 2004, Mr. Sexton served as a director from March 1995, its President and its Chief Executive Officer from June 1995 and Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1999. Following the merger, Mr. Sextonis a pastwas the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Evergreen Energy Inc. (formerly known as KFx, Inc. and not affiliated with his previous employer, Evergreen Resources, Inc.) until April 2007. Mr. Sexton has formerly been president of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association, a board member of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, an executive committee member of the Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States and a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.Robert A. Solberg.Mr. Solberg earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of North Dakota in 1969, and is a licensed Petroleum Engineer. Mr. Solberg spent over three decades working for Texaco Inc. throughout the world. He served his last ten years as a Corporate Vice President with several management roles including President of International Exploration and Production and President of Upstream Commercial Development. He elected to retire in 2002 and joined the
Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors in 2002. He continues to live in Houston, Texas with a focus on investment management and business consultation. Mr. Solberg serves as an outside Director and non-executive Chairman of JDR Cable Systems, Ltd., a privately owned British company. Since Decemberof2005, Mr. Solberg has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors for Scorpion Offshore Ltd, a Bermuda based corporation that owns and operates offshore drilling rigs. He also enjoys a history of civic leadership and serves on the University of North Dakota Alumni Association Board with a director role on their investment committee.Jim A. Watson.Mr. Watson became a Director of the Company in September 2004. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Texas in 1962 and graduated, with honors, from The University of Texas School of Law in 1964. Mr. Watson has served as Senior Counsel for the law firm of Carrington, Coleman, Sloman, & Blumenthal, L.L.P. in Dallas, Texas since June 2003. Before then, he was a partner at the law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. in Dallas, Texas. From 1987 to 1995, he held the position of Adjunct Professor at The University of Texas School of Law and from 2000 to 2004, Mr. Watson was Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Clement Center for Southwestern Studies at Southern Methodist University. Since 1989, Mr. Watson has been included inThe Best Lawyers in America.
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of the Company held
sixteenseventeen meetings during2006,2007, and its independent directors met in executive session four times during2006. No director2007. During 2007, each of the directors attendedfewer thanat least 75 percent of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board of Directors on which that directorserved.served, other than Mr. Sexton who attended 65 percent. Mr. Sexton attended all of the regular in-person meetings of the Board of Directors; however, in 2007, many of the meetings of the Board of Directors were telephonic meetings scheduled on relatively short notice and conflicted with Mr. Sexton’s previous commitments.The Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Development Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Audit Committee.Information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee and its membership is set forth in the
"Audit“Audit CommitteeReport",Report” included herein and also the"Audit“Audit CommitteeCharter"Charter” that is posted on theCompany'sCompany’s website atwww.pxd.com.www.pxd.com. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Gardner (Chairman), Risch, Solberg and Watson, and Mrs. Lawson. The Audit Committee heldseventwelve meetings during2006.2007.Compensation and Management Development Committee.Responsibilities of the Compensation and Management Development Committee (the
"Compensation Committee"“Compensation Committee”), which are discussed in detail in its charter that is posted on theCompany'sCompany’s website atwww.pxd.com, include among other duties, the responsibility to:operiodically review the compensation, employee benefit plans and fringe benefits paid to, or provided for, executive officers of the Company,
8oapprove the annual salaries, bonuses and share-based awards paid to the
Company'sCompany’s executive officers,operiodically review and recommend to the full Board of Directors total compensation for each non-employee director for services as a member of the Board of Directors and its committees,
oadminister the
Company'sCompany’s equity plans, andooversee the
Company'sCompany’s succession planning.The Compensation Committee is delegated all authority of the Board of Directors as may be required or advisable to fulfill the purposes of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate. Meetings may, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, include members of the
Company'sCompany’s management,independentother members of the Board of Directors, consultants or advisors, and such other persons as the Compensation Committee or its chairperson may determine.The Vice President, Administration and Risk Management of the Company, or such other officer as may from time to time be designated by the Compensation Committee, acts as the management liaison to the Compensation Committee and works with the Compensation Committee chairperson to prepare an agenda for regularly scheduled meetings. The Compensation Committee chairperson makes the final decision regarding the agenda for regularly scheduled meetings and develops the agenda for special meetings based on the information supplied by the persons requesting the special meeting. The
Company'sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer (the"CEO"“CEO”) makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of other executive officers and provides information to the Compensation Committee regarding the executiveofficers'officers’ performance; however, the Compensation Committee makes all final decisions regarding the executiveofficers'officers’ compensation.The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, amend the engagement with, and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of director, CEO or executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to approve the
consultant'sconsultant’s fees and other retention terms and has authority to cause the Company to pay the fees and expenses of suchconsultants. During
2006,2007, the Compensation Committee engaged the services ofMercer Human Resource Consulting ("Mercer"Hewitt Associates (“Hewitt”). Among the servicesMercerHewitt was asked to perform were apprising the Compensation Committee of compensation-related trends, developments in the marketplace and industry best practices; informing the Compensation Committee of compensation-related regulatory developments; providing peer group survey data to establish compensation ranges for the various elements of compensation; providing an evaluation of the competitiveness of theCompany'sCompany’s executive compensation and benefits programs; assessing the relationship between executive pay and performance; and advising on the design of theCompany'sCompany’s incentive compensation programs, including metric selection and target setting and the design of theCompany'sCompany’s performance unit award program.The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Buchanan (Chairman), Baroffio, Lundquist and Ramsey. The Compensation Committee held
tenseven meetings during2006.2007.Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in evaluating potential new members of the Board of Directors, recommending committee members and structure, and advising the Board of Directors about corporate governance practices. Additional information regarding the functions performed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is set forth in
"Corporate Governance"the “Corporate Governance” section included herein and also in the"Nominating“Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeCharter"Charter” that is posted on theCompany'sCompany’s website atwww.pxd.com.www.pxd.com. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include all non-employee directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee heldfourthree meetings during2006. 92007. ITEM TWO
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for
2007.2008. Ernst & Young LLPhavehas audited theCompany'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements since 1998. The20062007 audit of theCompany'sCompany’s annual consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting was completed on February 19,2007.2008.The Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The submission of this matter for approval by stockholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of that firm as the
Company'sCompany’s auditors.The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the
Company'sCompany’s auditors. Thestockholders'stockholders’ ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change auditors at any time.Audit Fees.The aggregate fees of Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered for the audits of the
Company'sCompany’s annual consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, audit of theCompany'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting, reviews of theCompany'sCompany’s quarterly financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, andreviews ofservices in connection with theCompany'sCompany’s other filings with theSecuritiesSEC, including review andExchange Commission (the "SEC"), includingpreparation of registration statements, comfort letters, consents andotherresearchworknecessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $1,826,000 and2005 were$1,876,000,and $1,371,000,respectively.Audit-Related Fees.The aggregate fees of Ernst & Young LLP for audit-related services provided to the Company totaled
$113,000$836,000 and$46,000$113,000 during each of the years ended December 31,20062007 and2005,2006, respectively. Audit-related services were comprised of audits of carve out financial statements included in registration statements, audits of theCompany'sCompany’s 401(k) Plan and certain affiliated partnerships and subsidiaries, and related out-of-pocket expenses.Tax Services Fees.The aggregate fees of Ernst & Young LLP for tax services provided to the Company totaled
$101,000$75,000 and$49,000$101,000 during the years ended December 31,20062007 and2005,2006, respectively. Tax services were primarily comprised of tax return preparation and review services for expatriates and theCompany'sCompany’s international subsidiaries and consultation on various tax issues.Other Fees.The aggregate fees of Ernst & Young LLP for other services provided to the Company during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $7,000 and
2005 totaled$6,000,and $6,500,respectively. The other services were comprised of access to Ernst & YoungLLP'sLLP’s on-line research services.The Charter of the
Company'sCompany’s Audit Committee requires that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve the plan and scope of Ernst & YoungLLP'sLLP’s audit, audit-related, tax and other services. During2006,2007, the Audit Committee pre-approved 100 percent of the services described above under the captions"Audit Fees"“Audit Fees”,"Audit-Related“Audit-Related Fees," "Tax” “Tax ServicesFees"Fees” and"Other“Other Fees."”The Company expects that representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.
10The audit report of Ernst & Young LLP on the Company's annual consolidated financial statements for 2006, 2005 and 2004 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty or audit scope. The audit report of Ernst & Young LLP on management's assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty or audit scope. In connection with the audits of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements for 2006, 2005 and 2004, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of such independent auditors, would have caused such independent accountants to make reference to the matter in their audit report.The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the auditors of the Company for
2007. ITEM THREE APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN There will be presented at the Annual Meeting a proposal to approve the Pioneer Natural Resources Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of September 1, 2007 (the "Plan"). This amendment and restatement will extend the termination date of the Plan from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2017. The amendment and restatement of the Plan will not increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan. The description set forth below represents a summary of the principal terms and conditions of the Plan and does not purport to be complete. Such description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan document, a copy of which has been filed with the SEC as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. General The Plan was originally adopted by the Company's Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders of the Company on August 7, 1997, and a total of 750,000 shares of common stock (the "Plan Shares") were reserved for issuance under the Plan at that time. The Plan was later amended and restated, effective as of December 9, 2005. The term of the Plan is set to expire on December 31, 2007. As of August 31, 2006 (the ending date of the last completed Option Period (as defined below) under the Plan), 280,473 Plan Shares had been issued, and 469,527 Plan Shares were available for future awards under the Plan. The Company now desires to amend and restate the Plan, contingent on stockholder approval, effective as of September 1, 2007. This amendment and restatement will not increase the number of Plan Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan. Instead, in addition to effectuating certain other modifications to the Plan, this amendment and restatement will extend the term of the Plan until December 31, 2017, so that the Plan Shares that remain available may be used in connection with the grant of future awards under the Plan. The Plan Shares that remain available for future grants under the Plan as of the September 1, 2007, effective date will equal the difference between (1) 750,000 shares and (2) the sum of (A) 280,473 shares (the shares already issued pursuant to the Plan), and (B) the number of shares issued pursuant to the current Option Period (which began on January 1, 2007, and ends on August 31, 2007). Based on the significant motivational and performance benefits that are achieved from employee ownership of the Company's common stock, the Company believes that it is important to continue making grants under the Plan by utilizing Plan Shares, the issuance of which has been previously approved by stockholders. Absent stockholder approval of this amendment and restatement, the current Option Period will continue in accordance with the terms of the Plan but no further Option Periods will commence under the Plan. 11Purpose The purpose of the Plan is to provide employees of the Company with an opportunity to purchase common stock of the Company at a discount through payroll deductions and to align the interests of Company employees with those of stockholders. The Plan, and the right of participants to make purchases thereunder, is intended to qualify under the provisions of sections 421 and 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). See "Federal Income Tax Consequences" below. Administration The Plan is administered by a committee (the "Plan Committee") appointed by the Board of Directors. All questions of interpretation of the Plan are determined by the Plan Committee, whose decisions are final and binding upon all participants. Eligibility All employees (other than officers) of the Company and of each present or future parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company, within the meaning of sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code, other than a foreign parent or subsidiary corporation whose participation has not been approved by the Board of Directors, who have been employed for at least six (6) months prior to the applicable Date of Grant (as defined below) and who are customarily employed at least twenty (20) hours per week and at least five (5) months per year are eligible to participate in the Plan, subject to certain limitations imposed by section 423(b) of the Code (an "Eligible Employee"). A participant who withdraws from the Plan during an Option Period (as defined below) will be eligible to again participate in the Plan in a subsequent Option Period, provided the participant is otherwise an Eligible Employee at that time. Offering Dates The Company offers Eligible Employees the option to purchase shares of common stock under the Plan. Except as otherwise determined by the Plan Committee, these options are granted on January 1 of each year (a "Date of Grant"). The term of each option granted under the Plan is for a period of eight (8) months, beginning on the Date of Grant and ending on the following August 31 (a "Date of Exercise") (each such eight (8) month period is herein referred to as an "Option Period"). Purchase Price The purchase price per share at which shares of common stock are sold under the Plan is an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 85 percent of the fair market value of the common stock on the Date of Exercise or (ii) 85 percent of the fair market value of the common stock on the Date of Grant (the "Purchase Price"). The fair market value of a share of common stock on a given date is the last reported sale price, regular way, on the composite tape of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") on that day. 12Payment of Purchase Price; Payroll Deductions The purchase price of the shares of common stock to be purchased under the Plan is accumulated by payroll deductions during each Option Period. For each participant, these payroll deductions may not exceed: (i) 15 percent of the amount of eligible compensation (which is generally defined in the Plan to include all wages, salary, commissions and bonuses) from which the deduction is made, or (ii) an amount which will result in noncompliance with the limitations described below in the section entitled "Purchase of Stock; Exercise of Option." Additionally, a deduction for any payroll period may not be in an amount less than $20.00. Such payroll deductions are credited to a book entry account established for each participant. An employee may, pursuant to certain limitations, discontinue participation in the Plan, but may not otherwise increase or decrease the rate of payroll deductions during any Option Period. If approved by the Plan Committee, (i) a participant may continue payroll deductions during a paid leave of absence, or (ii) a participant on an unpaid leave of absence may continue participation in the Plan by making cash payments on the participant's normal pay days equal to the participant's payroll deductions. Purchase of Stock; Exercise of Option The maximum number of shares placed under option to a participant in any Option Period cannot exceed the lesser of (i) 1,000 shares, and (ii) the number determined by dividing (A) the amount of payroll deductions during the Option Period (including any carryover amounts from the preceding Option Period and any cash payments made by the participant during an unpaid leave of absence) by (B) the Purchase Price, excluding all fractions. Unless a participant withdraws from the Plan, the participant's option for the purchase of shares is exercised automatically on each Date of Exercise for the maximum number of whole shares at the applicable price. As soon as practicable following the end of each Option Period, the Company deposits in each participant's brokerage account the number of whole shares of common stock purchased for such Option Period. Shares of common stock purchased under the Plan are uncertificated and evidenced by book entry in the brokerage accounts unless a certificate is requested by a participant in writing. Any balance remaining in a participant's account following the exercise of the participant's option in an Option Period is, at the Company's election, either carried over to the next Option Period or refunded to the participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Eligible Employee is granted an option to purchase shares of common stock under the Plan if, immediately after the grant of the option, the employee would own five percent or more of the voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or its subsidiaries, nor is any Eligible Employee granted an option which would permit the employee to purchase, pursuant to the Plan, more than $25,000 worth of common stock (determined at the fair market value of the shares at the time the option is granted) in any calendar year. Withdrawal Any participant may withdraw in whole from the Plan (i) at any time prior to 30 days before the Date of Exercise relating to a particular Option Period, or (ii) for a subsequent Option Period, by giving a notice of withdrawal to the Company at least 30 days prior to the beginning of such Option Period. Partial withdrawals are not permitted. A participant who wishes to withdraw from the Plan must timely deliver to the Company a notice of withdrawal on a form prepared by the Plan Committee. The Company, promptly following the time when the notice of withdrawal is delivered, refunds to the participant the amount of the cash balance in his account under the Plan. Thereafter, the participant's payroll deduction authorization and the participant's interest in unexercised options under the Plan terminates automatically and without any further act on the participant's part. 13Capital Changes Whenever any change is made in the common stock, by reason of a stock dividend or by reason of subdivision, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, combinations, reclassification of shares, or other similar change, appropriate action is taken by the Plan Committee to adjust accordingly the number of shares subject to the Plan, the maximum number of shares that may be subject to any option, and the number and purchase price of shares subject to options outstanding under the Plan. Nonassignability Each option is assignable or transferable only by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and is exercisable during the optionee's lifetime only by the optionee. The Company will not recognize and is under no duty to recognize any assignment or purported assignment by an employee of his option or of any rights under his option, and any such attempt may be treated by the Company as an election to withdraw from the Plan. Amendment and Termination of the Plan The Board of Directors, in its discretion, may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which options have not been granted. The Board of Directors has the right to alter or amend the Plan or any part thereof from time to time without the approval of the stockholders of the Company; provided, that no change in any option granted may be made that would impair the rights of the participant without the consent of such participant; and provided, further, that the Plan Committee may not make any alteration or amendment that would increase the aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the provisions of the Plan (other than as a result of the anti-dilution provisions of the Plan), change the class of individuals eligible to receive options under the Plan, cause options issued under the Plan to fail to meet the requirements for employee stock purchase plans as defined in section 423 of the Code, or otherwise modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company. The current termination date of the Plan is December 31, 2007, and if the amendment and restatement of the Plan is approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the termination date of the Plan will be extended to December 31, 2017. Federal Income Tax Consequences The Plan, and the right of participants to make purchases thereunder, is intended to qualify under the provisions of sections 421 and 423 of the Code. Under these provisions, no income is taxable to a participant at the time of grant of the option or purchase of the shares. Upon disposition of the shares, the participant is generally subject to tax in an amount that is determined based upon the participant's holding period. If the shares have been held by the participant for more than two years after the Date of Grant, the lesser of (A) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of such disposition over the Purchase Price or (B) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the Date of Grant over the Purchase Price is treated as ordinary income, and any further gain or loss is treated as long-term capital gain or loss. If the shares are disposed of before the expiration of this two year holding period, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the Date of Exercise over the Purchase Price is treated as ordinary income, and any further gain or loss on such disposition is long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period. The Company is not entitled to a deduction for amounts taxed as ordinary income or capital gain to a participant except to the extent of ordinary income reported by participants upon disposition of shares within two years from the Date of Grant. The foregoing brief summary of the effect of federal income taxation upon the participants in the Company with respect to the purchase of shares under the Plan does not purport to be complete, and reference should be made to the applicable provisions of the Code. In addition, this summary does not discuss the tax consequences of a participant's death or the provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country that may apply. 14Employee Stock Purchase Plan Benefit Table As of the date of this Proxy Statement, no employee of the Company has subscribed for or purchased any shares under the Plan for delivery after December 31, 2007, the current termination date. Directors and officers are not eligible to participate in the existing Plan, and will not be eligible to participate in the amended and restated Plan, if approved. The following table sets forth the number of Plan Shares purchased and the dollar value of the benefit received by those employees participating in the existing Plan in 2006:
Groups Number of Shares Value of Benefit (1) ---------------- --------------------All Executive Officers as a Group -- $ -- Non-Executive Director Group -- -- Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (approximately 500 persons) 43,879 274,682.54 ------ --------------- Total 43,879 $ 274,682.54 ====== ===============- ----------- (1) Represents the product of (i) the number of shares purchased times (ii) the difference between the Purchase Price of $35.45 and $41.71, the closing price of the Company's common stock on August 31, 2006, the Date of Exercise.If the Plan submitted to stockholders is not approved by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, no shares will be sold under the Plan after its expiration on December 31, 2007. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Pioneer Natural Resources Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan. EQUITY2008.COMPENSATION
PLAN INFORMATION The following table provides certain information about the Company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2006:
Number of Securities Number of Remaining Available for Securities to Future Issuance Under be Issued Equity Compensation Upon Exercise Weighted Average Plans (Excluding of Outstanding Exercise Price of Securities Reflected in the Options (1) Outstanding Options First Column) (2) -------------- ------------------- ---------------------------Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (3): Pioneer Natural Resources Company: 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan -- -- 4,525,451 Long-Term Incentive Plan (adopted 1997) 1,464,609 $20.99 -- Employee Stock Purchase Plan -- -- 469,527 Predecessor plans 136,886 $14.39 -- --------- --------- 1,601,495 4,994,978 ========= =========- ----------- (1) There are no outstanding warrants or equity rights awarded under the Company's equity compensation plans. The securities do not include restricted stock awarded under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan (adopted 1997) and the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (2) In May 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which provides for the issuance of up to 4.6 million shares of common stock. No additional awards may be made under the prior Long-Term Incentive Plan. The number of remaining securities available for future issuance under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan is based on the original authorized issuance of 750,000 shares less 280,473 cumulative shares issued through December 31, 2006. The Company expects to issue to participants approximately 54,000 shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan during the current Option Period, assuming a purchase price of 85 percent of the fair market value of the common stock on the Date of Grant (if the fair market value on the Date of Exercise is lower, the Purchase Price will be lower and more shares will be issued). (3) All equity compensation plans have been approved by security holders.15COMPENSATIONCompensation of Directors
20062007 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to non-employee directors during
2006:2007:
Name
(a)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash (1)
($)
(b)
Stock Awards (2), (3),
(4) and (5)
($)
(c)
All Other
Compensation (6)
($)
(g)
Total
($)
(h)
James R. Baroffio
$
67,500
$
80,000
$
—
$
147,500
Edison C. Buchanan
$
—
$
142,528
$
1,568
$
144,096
R. Hartwell Gardner
$
—
$
155,009
$
582
$
155,591
Linda K. Lawson
$
67,500
$
80,000
$
—
$
147,500
Andrew D. Lundquist
$
60,000
$
80,016
$
—
$
140,016
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr.
$
50,000
$
105,000
$
—
$
155,000
Frank A. Risch
$
67,500
$
121,687
$
76
$
189,263
Mark S. Sexton
$
60,000
$
80,000
$
—
$
140,000
Robert A. Solberg
$
—
$
147,500
$
219
$
147,719
Jim A. Watson
$
67,500
$
111,250
$
—
$
178,750
___________
Name Fees Earned(1)
Amounts represent fees earned or
Stock Awards (1), (2) All Other Total Paidpaid inCash (3)cash for services as a director during 2007, including the cash portion of the annual base retainer fee and(4) Compensation (5) ($) ($) ($) ($) (a) (b) (c) (g) (h) - ---------------------- -------------- --------------------- ---------------- -----------James R. Baroffio $ 62,515 $ 73,333 $ 601 $ 136,449 Edison C. Buchanan $ 57 $ 131,389 $ 957 $ 132,403 R. Hartwell Gardner $ 31 $ 144,722 $ 2,817 $ 147,570 Linda K. Lawson $ 62,515 $ 73,333 $ - $ 135,848 Andrew D. Lundquist $ 30,015 $ 88,889 $ 7,062 $ 125,966 Charles E. Ramsey, Jr. $ 31 $ 143,611 $ - $ 143,642 Frank A. Risch $ 64,390 $ 115,000 $ 657 $ 180,047 Mark S. Sexton $ 55,015 $ 73,333 $ 41,255 $ 169,603 Robert A. Solberg $ 28,805 $ 118,333 $ 978 $ 148,116 Jim A. Watson $ 62,515 $ 115,000 $ - $ 177,515 James L. Houghton (6) $ 14,375 $ 5,003 $ - $ 19,378 Jerry P. Jones (6) $ 45,625 $ 20,000 $ 1,671 $ 67,296- ----------- (1)committee chairmanship or membership fees incurred in connection with service on the Board or any committee of the Board.
(2)
Stock awards represent
directorthe dollar amount of compensation expense attributable to restricted stock unit awardsfor director services provided torecognized by the Companyduringfor financial statement reporting purposes for the year ended December 31,2006,2007, determined in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),"Share-Based Payment" ("“Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)"”).(2)The Company valued its restricted stock unit awards based on the market-quoted closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last business day prior to the grant date of the awards. Additional detail regarding the Company’s share-based awards is included in Note H of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(3)
The grant-date fair values of stock awards granted to directors during
20062007 computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R) were as follows: (i) for Messrs. Baroffio, Lundquist, Ramsey, Risch, Sexton and Watson and Mrs. Lawson,$79,985;$79,959; (ii) for Mr. Buchanan,$142,443;$142,424; (iii) forMessrs.Mr. Gardner,and Ramsey, $154,969;$154,927; and (iv) for Mr. Solberg,$147,445. (3)$147,415.
(4)
Aggregate director stock awards for which restrictions had not lapsed as of December 31,
2006,2007, totaled (i)1,8711,650 shares for Messrs. Baroffio, Lundquist,andRamsey, Sexton and Watson and Mrs.Lawson,Lawson; (ii)2,6012,939 shares for Mr.Buchanan,Buchanan; (iii)2,7483,197 shares forMessrs. Gardner and Ramsey;Mr. Gardner; (iv)3,9072,668 shares for Mr. Risch; and (v)2,6602,346 shares for Mr.Solberg; and (vi) 3,126 shares for Mr. Watson.Solberg. In accordance with director elections, shares for which vesting services had been performed but for which share issuance has been deferred totaled (i)3,7056,306 shares for Mr.Buchanan,Buchanan; (ii)4,1816,929 shares for Mr.Gardner,Gardner; and (iii)2,9084,779 shares for Mr. Lundquistand (iv) 4,181 shares for Mr. Ramseyas of December 31,2006. (4) Aggregate vested2007.
(5)
No options to purchase the
Company'sCompany’s common stockthatremained unexercised by directors as of December 31,2006 totaled (i) 10,000 options for Mr. Baroffio; (ii) 16,236 options for Mr. Gardner; (iii) 10,000 options for Mr. Ramsey; and (iv) 9,000 options for Mr. Houghton. (5)2007.
(6)
All other compensation includes travel and entertainment costs of
directors' spouses, and also includes cash consideration payable to the Messrs. Lundquist and Sexton in the amount of $5,744 and $41,255, respectively, in connection with the Company's 2004 merger with Evergreen Resources, Inc., which consideration was deferred in accordance with the terms of the merger until the exercise of certain Evergreen stock options assumed by the Company. (6) Mr. Houghton retired from the Board in December 2005 and Mr. Jones retired from the Board in May 2006.directors’ spouses.The Board of Directors believes providing competitive compensation is necessary to attract and retain qualified non-employee directors. The Board of Directors believes that the compensation package should require a significant portion of the total compensation package to be equity-based to align the interests of the directors and the
Company'sCompany’s stockholders, but should also allow each director the flexibility to choose to receive a portion of thedirector'sdirector’s compensation in cash.16The elements of compensation for the
Company'sCompany’s non-employee directors for the2006-20072007-2008 director year, which runs from the annual meeting of20062007 to the annual meeting of2007,2008, are as follows:oEach non-employee director receives an annual base retainer fee of $50,000 and an annual fee of $10,000 for service on one or more committees.
oEach non-employee director receives an annual equity award of $80,000 in restricted stock units, which vests one year following the date of the award.
oAudit Committee members receive an additional $7,500 annual fee.
oThe geosciences specialist on the Board of Directors receives an additional $7,500 annual fee.
oThe lead director receives an additional $15,000 annual fee.
oThe chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $7,500 annual fee.
oThe chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an additional $2,500 annual fee.
Beginning with the 2008-2009 director year, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the annual equity award from $80,000 in restricted stock units to $120,000 in restricted stock units.
Additionally, each non-employee director is provided information technology support by the Company and is also reimbursed for travel expenses to attend meetings of the Board of Directors or its committees, travel and entertainment expenses for each
director'sdirector’s spouse who is invited to accompany directors to meetings of the Board of Directors, director education, seminars and trade publications. No additional fees are paid for attendance at Board of Directors or committee meetings. TheCompany'sCompany’s CEO does not receive additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors.Under this compensation program, non-employee directors are eligible to receive their fees in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance units. The Company can use these awards instead of cash to pay its non-employee directors all or part of their annual fees. The Board of Directors determines the form (or combination of forms) of compensation each year, based on the economic and other circumstances at the time of award and based on its view of which awards will best align the interests of the stockholders and the Board of Directors. For the
2006-20072007-2008 director year, the non-employee directors could choose to be compensated for their annualdirectors'directors’ fees in (i) 100 percent cash, (ii) 100 percent restricted stock units("RSU"(“RSU”) or (iii) a 50/50 combination thereof. The restricted stock units received in payment of annualdirectors'directors’ fees vest quarterly on a pro rata basis during the director year. The price used to calculate the number of restricted stock units granted with respect to both the annual equity award and any fees that a director chooses to receive in restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price on the day prior to theCompany'sCompany’s annual meeting of stockholders.Each non-employee director, upon commencement of initial service as a director, receives $150,000 in restricted stock units. Directors who served on the board of directors of a company that was acquired or merged into the Company and joined the
Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors as a result of the acquisition or merger are not eligible for this award. The price used to calculate the number of restricted stock units granted is based on the closing stock price on the day prior to the day the director is elected to serve on the Board of Directors. The shares granted are subject to vesting and transfer restrictions that lapse with respect to one-third of the shares each year following the grant over a three-year period. Retirement before the third anniversary of the grant results in pro rata vesting based on the number of quarterly meetings remaining in the three-year vesting period.The vesting of ownership and the lapse of transfer restrictions on restricted stock units to non-employee directors is accelerated in the event of the death or disability of the director or a change in control of the Company.
To support the
Company'sCompany’s commitment to significant stock ownership, the Company has established an ownership guideline that non-employee directors own stock with a value equal to at least five times eachdirector'sdirector’s annual base retainer fee. The non-employee directors have three years after joining the Board of Directors to meet this guideline. All non-employee directors are in compliance with this ownership guideline.17Compensation of Executive Officers
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
Successful executionThe purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is to communicate the
Company's strategic plan is predicated on attracting and retaining a talented and highly motivated executive team. Unwanted turnover among the Company's key executives can be very costly to stockholders. Therefore, the Company's executiveCompany’s compensation programhas been designed to support its long-term strategic objectives, as well as addressfor therealities ofnamed executive officers listed on thecompetitive market for talent.“Summary Compensation Table” that follows this discussion (the “NEOs”) and explain how the program is implemented by the Company and the Compensation Committee.Compensation Principles
The
Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program has been designed to provide a total compensation package that allows the Company to attract, retain and motivate executives necessary to capably manage theCompany'sCompany’s business.The Company's executive compensationThis program is guided by several key principles:oTo
be fairprovide an appropriate mix of fixed and variable pay components tobothestablish a “pay-for-performance” oriented compensation program;To create compensation programs that align the
executive andinterests of theCompany; oCompany’s executives with those of the Company’s stockholders;To provide total compensation opportunities at levels that are competitive for comparable positions at companies with whom the Company competes for talent;
oTo provide financial incentives to the
Company'sCompany’s executives to achieve key financial and operational objectives set by the Board of Directors;oTo
provide an appropriate mix of fixed and variable pay components to establish a "pay-for-performance" oriented compensation program; o To provide compensation that takes into consideration the education, training and knowledge that is specific to each job and the unique qualities the individual bringsbe fair to thejob;executives, the Company andoits stockholders; andTo recognize an
executive'sexecutive’s commitment and dedication in the performance of the job and to support theCompany'sCompany’s culture.Establishing the Executive Compensation Program
Guided by the compensation principles listed above, the Compensation Committee also considers the following factors when making compensation decisions for the NEOs:
Historical compensation levels;
Competitive pay practices at companies in the Company’s peer group;
Industry conditions;
Corporate performance as compared to internal goals and to the peer group;
Internal pay equity among the Company’s executives; and
The
Company's executiveoverall effectiveness of the Company’s compensation programtakesin achieving desired results.The Compensation Committee views the executives below the level of the CEO and Chief Operating Officer as a team with diverse duties, but with similar authority and responsibility. This team approach is factored into
considerationdetermining pay decisions for this group of executives.The Compensation Committee does not assign any particular weighting to the
marketplacefactors described above when making compensation decisions for theindividuals that the Company wishes to attract, retain and motivate; the Company's past practices; and the talents that each individual executive brings to the Company.NEOs.Role of the Compensation and Management Development
Committee. The CompensationCommitteeadministers. As a part of its oversight of theCompany'sCompany’s executive compensationprogram. Theprogram, the CompensationCommittee establishesCommittee:Administers the
Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program;Establishes the Company’s overall compensation
strategy to ensure thatphilosophy and strategy; andEnsures the
Company's executivesNEOs are rewarded appropriatelyand that executive compensation supportsin light of theCompany's business strategy and objectives.guiding principles as described in the sections above.In discharging its duties, the Compensation
Committee annually approvesCommittee:Approves specific annual corporate goals and objectives relative to Mr.
Sheffield'sSheffield’s compensation;reviewsReviews Mr.
Sheffield'sSheffield’s performance in meeting these corporate goals and objectives; anddeterminesDetermines the individual elements of
hisMr. Sheffield’s total compensation and benefits.Prior to finalizing compensation for Mr. Sheffield, the Compensation Committee reviews its intentions with the other independent directors of the Company and receives their input.
Mr. Sheffield makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of the
named executive officers listed on the "Summary Compensation Table" that follows this discussion (the "NEOs"),other NEOs, and provides information to the Compensation Committee regardingthe NEOs'their performance; however, the Compensation Committee makes all final decisions regarding theNEOs'NEOs’ compensation.The Compensation Committee utilizes tally sheets to review each
executive'sNEO’s total compensation and potential payouts in the event of a change in control and for various terminating eventsas a checkto determine if the compensation plan design is meeting the CompensationCommittee'sCommittee’s objectives.The Company has never, subsequent to the award or payment of compensation, restated or adjusted the performance measures upon which the awards or payments were based and, as 18such, the Compensation Committee has not developed a policy regarding the adjustment or recovery of awards or payments under these conditions.A further description of the duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee can be found in
"Meetings“Meetings and Committees of Directors - Compensation and Management Development Committee."”Role of Executive Officers. The Company’s Administration and Human Resources Departments assist the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant in gathering the information needed for their respective reviews of the Company’s executive compensation program. This assistance includes assembling requested compensation data for the NEOs. As referenced in the section above, the CEO develops pay recommendations for the other NEOs for approval by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, in executive session and without executive officers present, approves the CEO’s pay levels. The CEO does not make recommendations to the Compensation Committee on his own pay levels.
Role of the Compensation
Consultant.Consultant. The Compensation Committee has retainedMercerHewitt as an outside advisor to provide information and objective advice regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee did not direct Hewitt to perform the above services in any particular manner or under any particular method. All of the decisions with respect to theCompany'sCompany’s executive compensation, however, are made by the Compensation Committeealonealone. The Compensation Committee has the final authority to hire andmay reflect factorsterminate the compensation consultant, andconsiderations other than, or that may differ from,theinformation and recommendations provided by Mercer. MercerCompensation Committee evaluates the compensation consultant annually.Hewitt may, from time to time, contact the
Company'sCompany’s executive officers for information necessary to fulfill its assignment and may make reports and presentations to and on behalf of the Compensation Committee that theCompany'sCompany’s executive officers also receive.Role of Executives. The Company's Administration and Human Resources Departments assistBenchmarking.In conjunction with its independent consultant, the Compensation Committee
and Mercer in gathering the information needed for their respective reviews of the Company's executive compensation program. This assistance includes assembling requested compensation data for the NEOs. The Compensation Committee also reviews the recommendations of the Company's CEO with respect to the compensation of the other NEOs. Benchmarking. In conjunction with Mercer, the Compensation Committee periodicallyannually benchmarks the competitiveness of its compensation programs to determine how well actual compensation levels compare to the overall philosophy andcompetitive markets. Theexternal market. Each year a peer groupgenerally consistsis established consisting of independent oil and gas exploration companies having similar asset, revenue and capital investment profiles as the Company. The Compensation Committee believesthatthese metrics are appropriate for determining peers because they provide a reasonable point of reference for comparinglikesimilar positions and scope of responsibility. The CompensationCommittee seeksCommittee’s objective is to construct a peer group with roughly equal numbers of companies that are larger than and smaller than the Company.FollowingFor 2007, the
Company's divestiture of significant assets in early 2006, theCompensation Committee approved a peer groupwas modified fromof the2005 peer group, which includedeleven companiesof greater revenue scope, to include the following companies for 2006:listed below:Apache Corporation
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cimarex Energy Co.
,EOG Resources, Inc.
, Kerr-McGee Corporation,Newfield Exploration Company
Noble Energy, Inc.
,Plains Exploration and Production Company
Pogo Producing Company
Quicksilver Resources Inc.
,Range Resources Corporation
andXTO Energy Inc.
In
addition, inorder toaccurately reflectincrease thecompetitivenumber of market reference points forexecutive talent, survey datapositions which lacked sufficient matches within the peer group, the Company also reviewed compensation levels forsimilar positions at other similarly-sized energythe four additional companieswith a focus on oil and gas exploration, are analyzed to develop a broader market point of reference. Surveys reviewed were published by leading human resource organizations, including Mercer. These surveys cover approximately 20 to 70 companies per positional match.listed below:Cabot Oil & Gas Co.
Devon Energy Corporation
Marathon Oil Corporation
Southwestern Energy Company.
The
Company'sCompany’s benchmarking consists of all components of direct compensation, including base salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentives. Information gathered from the proxy statements of the peer group and Hewitt’s proprietary databases for theCompany's CEO and other NEOs and Mercer's proprietary databasesnamed companies in the peer group, are reviewed as a part of the benchmarking effort.Given the changing nature of the Company's industry, the actual companies used in the benchmarking process will vary from year to year, and theThe Compensation Committeeintends to reviewreviews the peer group each year andmakemakes changesif appropriate. 19as needed. The peer group used in 2007 was the same group used in 2006, except that Apache Corporation was added to replace Kerr-McGee Corporation, which had been acquired. After the establishment of the 2007 peer group, Pogo Producing Company was acquired, and, for the 2008 peer group, has been replaced by Forest Oil Corporation. Elements of the
Company'sCompany’s Compensation ProgramComponents of Compensation.There are four main components of the
Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program:oBase salary;
oAnnual cash incentives;
oLong-term equity
incentives;incentives, including a combination of restricted stock grants andoperformance based restricted stock units grants; andOther compensation, including perquisites and retirement benefits.
The Compensation Committee considers each of these components within the context of a total rewards framework. The proportion of compensation allocated, or targeted, to each of these components is generally designed to be consistent with competitive practices among
exploration and production companies andthemarkets in which the Company competes for executive talent.peer group. The Compensation Committee believes that the appropriate balance of these components will align the interests of executives with those of theCompany'sCompany’s stockholders and facilitate the creation of value for stockholders.In making executive compensation decisions, the Company is guided by the compensation philosophy described above. The Compensation Committee also considers historical compensation levels, competitive pay practices at the companies in the Company's peer group and the relative compensation levels of the named executive officers among that group. The Compensation Committee views the executives below the CEO level as a team with diverse duties, but with similar authority and responsibility and factors this team approach into determining pay decisions for this group. The Company may also consider industry conditions, industry life cycle, corporate performance as compared to internal goals as well as to the peer group and the overall effectiveness of the Company's compensation program in achieving desired results.Balance of Compensation Components.The
Company'sCompany’s program offers the NEOs the opportunity to receive base pay at the median of the market and total compensation that is above or below target, depending upon the achievement of performance hurdles in the annual incentive plan and the long-term incentive plan. As a result, the compensation program is designed to pay executives at the median of the market for target performance, significantly above the median in times of superior performance and significantly below the median in times of poor performance. In addition, the Company believes that as anexecutive'sexecutive’s leadership role expands and the associated scope, duties and responsibilities increase, a greater portion of the
executive's totalcompensation should bevariable andperformance-driven and have a longer-term emphasis.The following sections describe in greater detail each of the components of the
Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program, why they were selected, and how the amounts of each element were determined for2006.2007.Base Salary
Base salary is designed to compensate the NEOs
in partfor their roles and responsibilities, and to provide a stable and fixed level of compensation that serves as a retention tool throughout theexecutive'sexecutive’s career. In determining the levels of base salaries, the Company considers eachexecutive'sexecutive’s role and responsibility,unique skills and future potential with the Company, along withexperience, salary levels for similar positions in theCompany's competitive marketCompany’s peer group and internal pay equity.The
Company'sCompensation Committee’s compensation philosophy is to target base salaries at the market median for each NEO.In general,Although the Compensation Committee targets the 50th percentile, the actual base salary may be slightly above or below based on level of experience and tenure in the role. NEOs with the same or similar levels of responsibilities and experience are targeted at the same base salary level.The 2007 benchmarking showed that salaries for most NEOs were below the 50th percentile of the peer group. Based on the 2007 benchmarking results and other factors described above and after consultation with the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee approved the following salary increases for 2008:
NEO
2007
Base Salary
2008
Base Salary
%
IncreaseScott D Sheffield
$
850,000
$
956,000
12.47
%
Richard P. Dealy
$
360,000
$
406,000
12.78
%
Mark S. Berg
$
340,000
$
376,000
10.58
%
Chris J. Cheatwood
$
340,000
$
376,000
10.58
%
Timothy L. Dove
$
525,000
$
531,000
1.14
%
At these levels the NEO’s base salaries are targeted to approximate the 50th percentile for their respective NEO positions.
For 2007, the fixed base salary represents
approximately 20 percent to 25between 18 and 27 percent of theNEO's overallNEO’s compensation package, assumingthatthe Company is paying at target performance levels for its incentive programs.20The Committee does not have a targeted weight of salary as a percentage of total pay. Annual Cash Bonus Incentives
Overview
The annual incentive bonus program is designed to recognize and reward the NEOs with cash payments based on both the
individual executive's performance and the Company'sCompany’s success in achieving its preset financial metrics for theyear. Targetyear and the individual executive’s performance.At or near the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee sets out each NEO’s target award
levels are setlevel as a percent ofan executive'sthe executive’s base salary.Overall,The Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy is to target thetargets are setaward levels at the median of theCompany'sCompany’s competitive market. These target award levels are reviewed periodically by theBoard of Directors and for 2006,Compensation Committee. For 2007, the target awards for theCompany'sNEOsranged from 65represented on average between 17 percentto 100and 20 percent of the NEO’s overall compensation package if paid at the target performance level. The Company does not have a targeted weight of annual cash bonus incentive as a percentage of total pay.The 2007 benchmarking showed that the levels of the target annual cash bonus incentive for the NEOs were set approximately at the 50th percentile of the market for each respective NEO positions. These target bonus percents of the NEO’s base
salary.salary are reflected in the following table.
NEO
Target
Bonus PercentScott D. Sheffield
100
%
Richard P. Dealy
80
%
Mark S. Berg
65
%
Chris J. Cheatwood
65
%
Timothy L. Dove
85
%
The
Company'sCompany’s annual bonus incentives are predicated on the achievement of certain internal performance metrics that drive theCompany'sCompany’s success rather than the achievement of goals measured relative to peer company performance. In setting its goals, the Compensation Committee considers its target levels compared to peer companies, but believes it is critical to set targets that are in line with the Company’s capabilities and business plan. As discussed below, the Compensation Committee believes that the 2007 long-term equity incentive portion of the compensation program, which represents the majority of the NEOs’ potential compensation, more effectively reflects the comparison of the Company’s performance relative to its peer group.The Compensation Committee
views thesebelieves the goalsas beingfor the internal performance metrics are aligned with theCompany'sCompany’s publicly disclosed operating and financialtargets and although ittargets. Although the Compensation Committee considers the goals challenging, it believesthatthey are achievable if theCompany'sCompany’s expectations as to industry, Company and individual performance are realized. The Compensation Committee also establishes certain non-financial objectives that vary by NEO depending on theNEO'sNEO’s area of responsibility. Since theCompany'sCompany’s culture is focused on teamwork and communication, theNEO'sNEO’s achievement of the individual goalsis alsoare generally based on the CompensationCommittee'sCommittee’s evaluation of theNEO'sNEO’s individual leadership oftheirhis departments and reportinggroups and ongroups. Additionally, the Compensation Committee considers the contribution made by the NEO to the senior management leadership team and to theCompany'sCompany’s success in achieving its annual goals.In evaluating performance against the goals and objectives, the Company does not employ a formula or weighting of the goals, but rather subjectively evaluates performance in light of oil and gas industry fundamentals and assesses how effectively management adapts to changing industry conditions and opportunities during the year. In determining the actual annual incentive bonus payouts, the Compensation Committee also takes into consideration expected annual incentive bonus payouts within the oil and gas industry.
On average, the target annual incentive award values currently represent about 20 percent of the total compensation package.Current Framework
Working with management,In February 2007, the Compensation Committee, working with management, established the
2006performance metrics and a goal or goal range for eachmetric.metric for 2007 bonuses payable in 2008. The metrics representedmany ofthe operating and financial measures critical to the success of exploration and production companies andthereforespecifically metrics critical to the Company’s success. The use of these metrics supported the CompensationCommittee'sCommittee’s philosophy that thecompensation package reflectannual incentive bonus reflects the Company’s overallcorporateperformance.21The
20062007 performance metrics and goals or goal ranges were as follows:
Metric
Goal
Result
Production/Share Growth
12%
14%
Production (barrel of oil equivalent (“BOE”))
35,000,000 - 37,000,000
35,500,000
Operating Costs ($/BOE)
Base
$
7.25 - $8.25
$
7.88
Total Operating Cost
$
11.00 - $12.00
$
11.84
G&A Overhead ($/BOE)
$
3.50 - $3.75
$
3.71
Net Debt
$
1,800,000,000 - $2,100,000,000
$
2,700,000,000
Finding Cost ($/BOE) (1)
$
12.00 - $18.00
$
15.39
Reserve Replacement Percentage (2)
Greater than 200%
362%
Return on Equity
7% - 12%
12%
____________
Metric Goal ------ ----Production (barrel of oil equivalent ("BOE")) 32,000,000 - 35,000,000 Operating Costs ($/BOE) Base $7.50 - $8.50 Total Operating Cost $11.00 - $12.00 Safety and Environmental Subjective G&A Overhead ($/BOE) $3.75 - $4.25 Debt $1,100,000,000 - $1,400,000,000 Debt/EBITDAX(1)
Less than 2.5 times Debt/Book Less than 30%“Finding
Cost ($/BOE) (2) $15.00 - $20.00 Reserve Replacement Percentage (3) Greater than 250% Return on Equity 10% - 15%- ------------ (1) "EBITDAX" represents earnings before depletion, depreciation and amortization expense; impairment of long-lived assets; exploration and abandonments; hurricane activity; accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations; interest expense; income taxes; gain or loss on the disposition of assets; loss on extinguishment of debt; effects from discontinued operations; commodity hedge related activity; stock-based compensation; amortization of deferred revenue; and other noncash items. (2) "Finding Costs"Cost” is determined by dividing total costs incurred by the summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to revisions of previous estimates, purchases of minerals-in-place and extensions and discoveries . Consistent with industry practice, future capital costs to develop proved undeveloped reserves are not included in costs incurred.(3) "Reserve Replacement"
(2)
“Reserve Replacement” is the summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to revisions of previous estimates, purchases of minerals-in-place and extensions and discoveries divided by annual production of oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas, on a BOE basis.
The CompanyAlthough the Compensation Committee did not establish a specific net asset value performance metric,
butthe Compensation Committee reviewed with management theCompany'sCompany’s net asset value per share calculation to understand how net asset valuewas increased or decreasedchanged during2006.2007. Changes in net asset value are important in the CompensationCommittee'sCommittee’s overall assessment of theCompany'sCompany’s performance and one of the key factors in the CompensationCommittee'sCommittee’s discretionary determination of final annual incentive bonus awards. Net asset value per share increased in 2007 relative to 2006. The Compensation Committee alsoestablishedreviews the safety and environmental performance of the Company compared to prior years’ experience and industry standards.In addition, for
20062007, the Compensation Committee worked with the CEO to establish individual non-financial objectives for each NEO based on operational and project–oriented factors in theoperational, project-oriented and otherNEO’s areas of responsibility. These were goalsthatthe Compensation Committeeworking withand Mr. Sheffield determined to be critical to the performanceof the NEO'sin each NEO’s area of responsibility.In February
2007,2008, the Compensation Committee reviewed theCompany's 2006Company’s 2007 performance relative to the internalmetrics againstmetrics. The Compensation Committee determined that thepeersCompany’s performance met or exceeded the goals set forth in the table above except for the goal related to the net debt metric, which was affected by the impact of acquisitions, stock repurchases andevaluatedrising service costs. Additionally, theindividual performanceCompany’s production was on the low end ofeach NEO.the goal range due to the divestiture of its Canadian subsidiary. Based on thisperformancereview, the Compensation Committee set the base level of20062007 annual incentive bonus payouts at110135 percent of target for theNEOs, excluding Mr. Sheffield and Mr. Dove. IndividualNEOs. Adjustments to individual awardswere then adjustedfrom the base level were then considered based on the performance of that individual.ForThe 2007 bonus payments as a percent of target for Mr. Sheffield andMr. Dove,theCompensation Committee also reviewedNEOs were as follows:
NEO
Scott D Sheffield
135
%
Richard P. Dealy
140
%
Mark S. Berg
140
%
Chris J. Cheatwood
135
%
Timothy L. Dove
135
%
For 2008, the
Company's stock price performancetarget bonus levels forcalendar year 2006. Based on that review, Mr. Sheffield and Mr. Dove were awarded annual incentive bonuses at target levels.NEOs did not change from the previous year.Long-Term Equity Incentives
Overview
The
Company'sCompany’s long-term incentive awards are used to link Company performance and increases in stockholder value to the total compensation for theCompany'sCompany’s NEOs. The annualized value of the long-term incentive awards is intended to be the largest component of the NEO’s overall compensation package. Assuming performance is at target, the long-term incentive awards represent approximately 60 percent of the NEOs’ total compensation. The Compensation Committee believes this significant emphasis on stock based compensation effectively aligns the interests of the NEOs with those of the Company’s stockholders, providing incentive to the NEOs to focus on the long-term success of the Company. These awards are also key components of theCompany'sCompany’s ability to attract and retain theCompany'sCompany’s key NEOs.Over the past several years, the Company modified its approach toThe value of each NEO’s long-term incentive
awards from solely stock options to a combinationaward is set at or near the beginning ofstock options and restricted stock and finally to an approach beginning in 2004 that included only restricted stock. For 2007, in order to more closely aligneach year after theinterests ofCompensation Committee reviews theNEOs with stockholders, the Company made grants in both restricted stock and performance units under a new performance unit program (See "2007 Long-Term Incentive Program" below for additional details). 22The target award levelsannual benchmarking. Awards areset by the Board of Directors and expressed as a percentage of base salary for each NEO. Targets are intended to betargeted at the median of theCompany'sCompany’s peer group, which is consistent with theCompany'sCompany’s overall philosophy.Grant levels in any given year may deviate on a discretionary basis fromIn addition to themedianbenchmark data, the Compensation Committee considers and reviews individual performance to determine the value of themarket based on measuring the Company's performance against internal metrics, total shareholder return ("TSR") compared to a peer group and individual performance. The Compensation Committee also considers the competitive environment for experienced oil and gas executives and the retention value oflong-term incentiveawards.award. The Compensation Committee generally does not consider the size or current value of prior long-term incentive awards in determining future award levels because the Compensation Committee believes that prior years’ awards areconsidered as only onea component ofathat specific year’s total compensationpackagedeterminedin the year awarded to beas competitive andappropriate.appropriate at that time.In administering the long-term incentive plan, awards are currently made to NEOs under the following guidelines:
All long-term incentive awards are approved during the regularly scheduled February Compensation Committee meeting.
The
annualizedCompensation Committee retains the discretion to approve long-term incentive awards effective on the hire date.Awards are determined based on a dollar value, which is converted to shares by reference to the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the prior calendar year.
The Company does not time the release of material non-public information to impact the value of executive equity compensation awards.
Current Framework
In order to meet the Company’s objectives for long-term incentive awards, grants of performance units and restricted shares were made to NEOs in February 2007. As described below, the
Company's NEOs is intended to be the largest component of the Company's overall compensation package. On average, and assumingperformanceis at target, these awards currently represent approximately 55 percent to 60 percent of the total compensation package, consistent with the Company's emphasis on linking executive pay to stockholder value. Restricted stock awards to executive officers vest on a three-year cliff vesting schedule. Grants made under the Company's performance unit plan for 2007units are earned based on performance over a three-yearperformance period.period and vest at the end of the three-year period, while the restricted stock awards vest three years following the date of grant. The Company believes that these mechanisms keep executives focused on the creation of long-term stockholder value.The
vesting of restricted stock and performance unit2007 awardsaccelerates upon a change in control. The Compensation Committee believes that providing this benefit is in line with the Company's compensation philosophy and provides continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change in control, and this practice was confirmed by Mercer to be in line with market practice for the Company's peers. Furthermore, the Company does not sponsor a defined benefit retirement plan as the Compensation Committee believes that the accumulation of Company stock is the preferred method to encourage the Company's NEOs to build a retirement portfolio. Current Framework In evaluating 2006 award levels, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company's three- and five-year performance against the following internal metrics. The Company did not employ a formula or weighting of the goals.
Metric Goal ------ ----Reserve Replacement Percentage 125% - 150% Finding Cost ($/BOE) $6.50 - $9.00 Net Asset Value Per Share Increase (1) 5% Production Growth Prior annual goals- ------------ (1) "Net Asset Value Per Share" is an estimate of fair value. In the context of determining Net Asset Value Per Share, the Company adds other tangible assets adjusted for working capital and deducts long-term debt and other liabilities, including future income taxes and the impact of existing hedge positions.In addition, 2006 award levelswerealso determined by considering the Company's TSR to the peer group for the previous three- and five-year periods. Finally, the Compensation Committee evaluated each executive's individual performance, contribution to the senior management leadership team and leadership provided to the Company. After reviewing these factors, the Compensation Committee concluded that the 2006 long-term incentive awards for Mr. Sheffield and the other NEOs as a group should be slightly below the 60th percentile to the target market. 232007 Long-Term Incentive Program At the end of 2006, the Company conducted a review of the Company's long-term incentive award philosophy with the intent of moving it more in line with the Company's pay for performance philosophy. Based on the results of the study, the 2007 long-term incentive awards to the NEOs were granted 50 percent in restricted stock andweighted 50 percent in performance unitsunder a new performance unit award program. Under this program, delivery of sharesand 50 percent inpayment of the performance unit awards will be contingent upon the achievement of certain performance criteria.restricted stock. The Compensation Committee intends to determine annually the allocation of future long-term incentive awardsbetweenamong performance units, restricted stockperformance unitsand other equity awards as well as the metrics that would be applicable to any performance-based award.The 2007 award values for each NEO were as follows:
NEO
2007
Restricted Stock
2007
Performance Units
Scott D. Sheffield
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
Richard P. Dealy
$
425,000
$
425,000
Mark S. Berg
$
350,000
$
350,000
Chris J. Cheatwood
$
350,000
$
350,000
Timothy L. Dove
$
650,000
$
650,000
Performance Units
In order to further align the interests of the NEOs with stockholders and to move long-term incentive awards in line with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the Company began granting performance units in 2007.
Although certain compensation awards, such as the annual incentive bonus,
have includedinclude a subjective evaluation factor, the Compensation Committee determined that performance under the performance unit award program should be measured objectively to keep executives in close alignment with stockholders. As such, performance under the2007performance unit award program is measured based on relativeTSRtotal stockholder return (“TSR”) over a three-year performance period. The Company believes relative TSR is an appropriate long-term performance metric because it generally reflects all elements of acompany'scompany’s performance and provides the best alignment of the interests of management and theCompany'sCompany’s stockholders.The peer group used in measuring relative TSR was the same group of companies approved by the Compensation Committee for external benchmarking. Payouts range from zero percent to 250 percent of a target number of units based on
therelative ranking.TheA target award payout corresponds to the Company’s ranking at the middle of the peer group at the end of the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2009. Any earned units will be paid instock, and dividendsstock. Dividends declared during the performance period will be paid at the end of the three-year performance period only on shares delivered for earned units up to a maximum of target shares.In administering the long-term incentive plan, award grants currently are made under the following guidelines: o For existing employees, all long-term incentive awards are approved during the regularly scheduled February Compensation Committee meeting. o Employees hired after the February Compensation Committee meeting, but prior to the regularly scheduled August Compensation Committee meeting, receive long-term awards approved during the August Compensation Committee meeting. o The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to approve long-term incentive awards effective on an employee's hire date. oVesting of unearned performance units accelerates upon a change in control.Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards are
determined based on a dollar value, which is convertedprovided toshares by referenceNEOs in order to encourage executive retention and stock ownership and to align theaverage closing priceinterests of theCompany's commonNEOs with those of the Company’s stockholders. Generally, the NEOs’ restricted stockduringawards vest on theprior calendar year. othird anniversary of the date of grant, provided the NEO remains employed with the Company. TheCompany does not time the releasevesting ofmaterial non-public information to impact the value of executive equity compensation awards. Other Compensation Overviewrestricted stock accelerates upon a change in control. The Compensation Committee believes that providing this benefit is in line with the Company’s compensation philosophy and is competitive with market practice for the Company’s peers. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that providing restricted stock encourages the NEOs to use the Company’s equity to build a retirement portfolio. The Compensation Committee believes this is preferable to providing a defined benefit retirement plan, and therefore, has decided to not sponsor such a plan.Other Compensation
Overview
The Compensation Committee believes that providing some perquisites and retirement benefits as components of total compensation is important in attracting and retaining qualified personnel; however, insofar as the Company has chosen to emphasize variable,
performance-basedperformance–based pay, the Company takes a conservative approach to these fixed benefits.Further, retirement plans are not viewed to be the sole means by which its executive officers will fund their retirement, as a portion of this need can be satisfied through the accumulation of Company stock acquired through equity awards. As a result, and because the costs and the ultimate payouts are difficult to quantify and control, the Company has purposely avoided sponsoring a defined benefit retirement plan or a supplemental executive retirement plan.TheCompany provides a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan with a fixed matching contribution rate to all employees, including the NEOs, and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan with a fixed Company matching contribution rate to certain of its more highly compensated employees, including the NEOs. 24The Company'sCompany’s perquisite, retirement and other benefit programs are established based upon an assessment of competitive market factors and a determination of what is needed to attract, retain and motivate high caliber executives.Perquisites
The perquisites provided to the NEOs are the payment of
country club dues,the costs of financial counseling services, annual medical physicalexamexams and personal use of theCompany'sCompany’s cell phones and computers.ThePayment of country club dues was removed as a perquisite for the NEOs and was replaced by a small base salary adjustment effective January 1, 2008.As of January 1, 2008, the Company
alsono longer pays the costof limited spousalfor Mr. Sheffield’s spouse’s travel andthe spouse'shis spouse’s cost to participate in business dinners or events. The Company pays for the costs for other NEOs’ spouses to participate in business dinners or events,ifwhich thespouse is attending atCompany expects to be minimal. Additionally, therequest of the Company. In addition to the above perquisites, Mr. Sheffield receivesCompany pays the premium for a $1,000,000 term life insurance policyand the costsforexpanded spousal travel for Mrs. Sheffield to participate in business dinners and business events to supportMr. Sheffield.The Company maintains a fractional ownership interest in two private
aircraft.aircrafts. Theseaircraftaircrafts are made available for business use to the executive officers and other employees of the Company. TheCompany'sCompany’s policy is togenerallynot permit employees, including executive officers, to use the aircraft for personal use. The Company expects there will be occasions when a personal guest (including a family member) will accompany an employee on abusiness relatedbusiness-related flight. In such instances, the Company will follow the Internal Revenue Service rules and, where required, impute income to the employee based on the Standard Industry Fare Level rates provided by the Internal Revenue Service.The
Company'sCompany’s NEOsalsoparticipate in theCompany'sCompany’s welfare benefit plan on the same basis as theCompany'sCompany’s other employees.Retirement Plans
All eligible employees of the Company, including the NEOs, may participate in the Company’s defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan. The Company contributes two dollars for every one dollar of
basicbase compensation (up to5%5 percent ofbasic compensation)base compensation and subject to the IRS imposed maximum contribution limits) contributed by the participant. Theparticipant'sparticipant’s contributions are fully vested at all times, and the Company’s matching contributions vest over a period of four years, with 25 percent vesting for each one-year period of service with the Company by the participant. Participants may make additional pre-tax and after-tax contributions to theplanplan. All contributions are subject to plan and Internal Revenue Service limits.The Company provides a non-qualified deferred compensation
retirementplan with a fixed Company matching contribution rate to certain of its more highly compensated employees, which includes the NEOs. The plan allows each participant to contribute up to 25 percent of base salary and 100 percent of annual incentive bonus payments. The Company provides a matching contribution equal to theparticipant'sNEO’s contribution, but limited to a maximum of ten percent ofthe executive officer'sbase salary. TheCompany'sCompany’s matching contribution vests immediately. The non-qualified deferred compensation plan permits eachexecutive officerparticipant to make investment allocation choices for boththe executive officer'stheir contribution and the Company match to designated mutual funds or to a self-directed brokerage account offered as investment options under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company retains the right to maintain these investment choices as hypothetical investments or to actually invest in theexecutive officer'sparticipant’s investment choices. To date, the Company has chosen to actually invest the funds in the investment options selectedby the executive officersso that the investment returns are funded and do not create unfunded liabilities to the Company.Participants may choose to receive distribution of their vested benefits from the
non-qualified compensationplan as soon as administratively practicable (i) after the date of separation from service with the Company or (ii) after January 1 of the year following the date of separation from service with the Company. Aparticipant'sparticipant’s vested benefits may, at the option of the participant, be distributed in one lump sum, in five annual installments or in ten annual installments.25The Company believes the plan is administered in operational compliance with all applicable rules and law. Because the costs and ultimate payouts are difficult to quantify and control, the Company has purposely avoided sponsoring a defined benefit retirement plan or supplemental executive retirement plan. Further, retirement plans are not viewed as the sole means by which its executive officers fund their retirement. The Committee believes that a portion of this need should be met through the accumulation of Company stock acquired through equity awards.
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
The Compensation Committee believes compensation issues related to severance and change in control events for the NEOs should be addressed through contractual arrangements.
The terms of these agreements are described later in "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control." The Company competes in an industry withAs ashortage of professionals with oil and gas expertise, long investment lead times that can affect short-term results, a fluctuating stock price often directly caused by the commodity price driven nature of the business and a history of merger and acquisition activity. To recruit and retain executives, provide continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change in control and provide the executive with the security to make decisions that are in the best long-term interest of the stockholders,result, the Company enters into severance and change in control agreements with each of its executive officers, including eachNEO. The Compensation Committee engaged advisors knowledgeableNEO, to meet the following objectives:Recruit and retain executives;
Provide continuity of management in the
fieldevent of an actual or threatened change in control; andProvide the executive
compensationwith the security toassistmake decisions that are inanalyzing current market practices and designing an agreement competitive with market practices.the best long-term interest of the stockholders.The terms of these agreements are described later in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To support the commitment to significant stock ownership, the
Company'sCompany’s common stock ownership guidelines are as follows:oFor the Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO, ownership of stock with a value equal to at least five times annual base salary.
oFor the President and other NEOs, ownership of stock with a value equal to at least three times annual base salary.
o The NEOsA NEO generally
havehas three years after becoming an executive officer to meet the guideline.As of December 31, 2007, the stock ownership of all NEOs significantly exceeded the stock ownership guidelines.
In evaluating compliance by executive officers and directors with the stock ownership guidelines, the Committee has established procedures to minimize the effect of stock price fluctuations on the deemed value of the
individual'sindividual’s holdings. All NEOs, including Mr. Sheffield, are in compliance with the ownership guidelines.Policy on Recovery of Compensation and Clawbacks
During 2008, the Compensation Committee intends to consider a policy regarding the possible recovery by the Company of certain incentive compensation paid to an NEO if that compensation was predicated upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement and, in the Board’s view, the officer engaged in certain misconduct that caused the need for the restatement.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive
officers.officers, including the NEOs. Each indemnification agreement requires the Company to indemnify each indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. This means, among other things, that the Company must indemnify the director or executive officer against expenses (includingattorneys'attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement that are actually and reasonably incurred inan action, suit ora legal proceeding by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent ofthe Company or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation or otherentity if the indemnitee meets the standard of conduct provided in Delaware law. Also as permitted under Delaware law, the indemnification agreements require the Company to advance expenses in defending such an action provided that the director or executive officer undertakes to repay the amounts if the person ultimately is determined not to be entitled to indemnification from the Company. The Company will also make the indemnitee whole for taxes imposed on the indemnification payments and for costs in any action to establishindemnitee'sthe indemnitee’s right to indemnification, whether or not wholly successful.26Tax and Accounting Considerations
Deductibility of Executive
Compensation.Compensation.The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 placed restrictions on the deductibility of executive compensation paid by public companies. Under the restrictions, the Company is not able to deduct compensation paid to any of the NEOs in excess of $1,000,000 unless the compensation meets the definition of"performance-based compensation"“performance-based compensation” as required in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Non-deductibilitycould resultresults in additional tax costs to the Company.The
Company generally tries to preserve the deductibility of all executive compensation if it can do so without interfering with the Company's ability to attract and retain capable and highly motivated senior management. The Company'sCompany’s annual incentive bonus plan does not meet the definition of performance-based compensation as required in Section 162(m) primarily because the annual incentive bonus plan is not formula driven and the Compensation Committee retains the right to make subjective evaluations of performance, including an assessment of how effectively management adapts to changing industry conditions and opportunities during theCompany'sCompany’s bonus year. TheCompany'sCompany’s restricted stock awards do not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Awards under the performance unit award program are designed to qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).Accordingly, the portions of compensation paid to the
Company'sCompany’s NEOs in20062007 that exceeded $1,000,000 (other than from the exercise of stock options) are generally not deductible. The Compensation Committee believes it is in the best interest of stockholders to use restricted stock and to continue with a discretionary element in the annual incentive bonus program.Awards under the performance unit award program are designed to qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).Portions of future restricted stock awards and annual incentive bonus awards may not be deductible. The Compensation Committee believes it is important to retain its discretionary judgment in evaluating performance-based pay and that a portion of the long-term incentive awards should be in restricted stock. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the approximate amount of the Section 162(m) loss of deduction and concluded that it should continue with its current practices.Non-qualified Deferred Compensation.On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, changing the tax rules applicable to non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements. While the final regulations have not become effective yet, the Company believes it is operating in good faith compliance with the statutory provisions, which were effective January 1, 2005. A more detailed discussion of the
Company'sCompany’s non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements is provided above under the heading"Retirement“Retirement Plans."”Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.Beginning on January 1, 2006, the Company began accounting for stock-based
payments includingawards under itsStock Option Program,Long-TermStock Grant Program, Restricted Stock Program and Stock Award ProgramEquity Incentives in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R)"Share-Based“Share-Based Payment." 272006”SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The compensation paid to the
Company'sCompany’s executive officers generally consists of base salaries, annual incentive bonus payments, awards under theCompany'sCompany’s Long-Term Incentive Plan, contributions to theCompany'sCompany’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan, contributions to theCompany'sCompany’s defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan and miscellaneous perquisites. The following table summarizes the total compensation for 2007 and 2006 awarded to, earned by or paid to the named executive officers, or the NEOs, comprised of (i) theCompany'sCompany’s CEO, (ii) theCompany'sCompany’s Chief Financial Officer, and (iii) the three most highly compensated executive officers in 2007 other thanitsthe CEO and Chief Financial Officer:
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus (1)
($)
Stock
Awards (2)
($)
Change in
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (3)
($)
All Other
Compensation
(4)
($)
Total
($)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Scott D. Sheffield
2007
$
850,000
$
1,147,500
$
2,616,382
$
129,518
$
226,305
$
4,969,705
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
2006
$
850,000
$
850,000
$
2,217,217
$
14,348
$
221,110
$
4,152,675
Richard P. Dealy
2007
$
360,000
$
403,200
$
647,099
$
3,294
$
74,657
$
1,488,250
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2006
$
360,000
$
277,200
$
445,132
$
34,397
$
74,660
$
1,191,389
Mark S. Berg
2007
$
340,000
$
309,400
$
590,771
$
—
$
61,545
$
1,301,716
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
2006
$
340,000
$
279,000
$
369,300
$
12,963
$
63,523
$
1,064,786
Chris J. Cheatwood
2007
$
340,000
$
298,350
$
576,464
$
—
$
79,071
$
1,293,885
Executive Vice President, Geoscience
2006
$
340,000
$
243,100
$
539,619
$
63,992
$
73,195
$
1,259,906
Timothy L. Dove
2007
$
525,000
$
602,438
$
1,049,521
$
14,027
$
86,352
$
2,277,338
President and Chief Operating Officer
2006
$
525,000
$
446,250
$
827,427
$
46,380
$
86,429
$
1,931,486
______________
Name and Principal Year Salary Bonus(1)
Stock Change in All Other Total Position ($) ($) Awards (2) Non-qualified Compensation ($) ($) Deferred (4) Compensation ($) Earnings (3) ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (h) (i) (j) - ---------------------- ----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------------- ----------Scott D. Sheffield 2006 $850,000 $850,000 $2,217,217 $14,348 $221,110 $4,152,675 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Richard P. Dealy 2006 $360,000 $277,200 $ 445,132 $34,397 $ 74,660 $1,191,389 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Chris J. Cheatwood 2006 $340,000 $243,100 $ 539,619 $63,992 $ 73,195 $1,259,906 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Exploration Timothy L. Dove 2006 $525,000 $446,250 $ 827,427 $46,380 $ 86,429 $1,931,486 President and Chief Operating Officer Danny L. Kellum 2006 $340,000 $276,250 $ 539,619 $19,199 $ 67,922 $1,242,990 Executive Vice President, Domestic Operations- -------------- (1)Bonus amounts represent discretionary bonuses earned during 2007 and 2006 under the
Company'sCompany’s annual incentive bonus program that were paid during March 2008 and February2007.2007, respectively. Although the amounts provided under this annual incentive bonus program are subject to certain performance targets, due to the level of discretion retained by the Company over the payment of these bonuses, the amounts do not constitute incentive plan awards within the meaning of the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules.
(2)
Stock awards represent the dollar amount of compensation expense
attributable to restricted stock and option awardsrecognized by the Company for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscalyearyears ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, attributable to restricted stock, stock option and performance unit awards granted in 2007 and prior years, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The Company valued its restricted stock awards based on the market-quoted closing price of theCompany'sCompany’s common stock on the last business day prior to the grant date of the awards.OptionStock option awards are valued as of the grant dates using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company’s performance units are valued using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Additional detail regarding theCompany'sCompany’s share-based awards is included in Note H of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in"Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and SupplementaryData"Data” in theCompany'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006.2007. The restricted stock and performance units awarded to the NEOs in 2007 are reflected below under “2007 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.” For additional information on restricted stock, stock options and performance units awarded to the NEOs in2007 and prior years that were outstanding as of December 31, 2007, see below under “2007 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.”
(3)
ChangesIn accordance with the rules of the SEC, changes in non-qualified deferred compensation earnings
representsrepresent theabove-marketearnings that accrued during 2007 and 2006 to the accounts of Messrs. Sheffield, Dealy, Berg, Cheatwood and Dove,and Kellum. Above-market earnings are calculated as annual earnings in excessto the extent that the rate ofa 5.98% annualreturn exceeded 120% of the applicable federalrate. 28rate of interest for that year, which was 5.80% and 5.98% in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(4)
All other compensation includes the Company contributions to the
NEOs'NEOs’ 401(k) retirement accounts and non-qualified deferred compensation plan, life insurance premiums, income tax reimbursement payments and other perquisites, as shown in the following table:
Year ended December 31, 2007
Scott D.
Sheffield
Richard P.
Dealy
Mark S.
Berg
Chris J.
Cheatwood
Timothy L.
Dove
401(k) contributions
$
22,500
$
22,770
$
22,500
$
22,496
$
22,496
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan
contributions
85,000
36,000
33,000
34,000
52,500
Life insurance premiums
7,762
804
1,134
1,134
2,622
Country club dues
6,495
5,157
4,911
5,651
5,700
Spousal travel & entertainment costs (a)
58,818
234
—
3,814
1,186
Financial counseling
9,150
9,150
—
9,150
—
Tax reimbursement payments (b)
35,815
242
—
2,061
1,106
Medical exams and other
765
300
—
765
742
$
226,305
$
74,657
$
61,545
$
79,071
$
86,352
______________
Scott D. Richard P. Chris J. Timothy L. Danny L. Sheffield Dealy Cheatwood Dove Kellum --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------401(k) contributions $ 22,125 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 Non-qualified deferred compensation plan contributions 85,000 36,000 34,000 52,500 34,000 Life insurance premiums 5,482 804 1,134 2,622 1,739 Country club dues 6,495 4,858 5,651 5,700 2,923 Spousal travel & entertainment costs(a)
38,955 - 1,175 694 4,590 Personal travel & entertainment costs (b) 6,084 - - - - Financial counseling 9,150 9,150 9,150 767 - Tax reimbursement payments (c) 42,637 1,083 85 2,146 2,370 Medical exams and other 5,182 765 - - 300 ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- $ 221,110 $ 74,660 $ 73,195 $ 86,429 $ 67,922 ========== ========== ========= ========== =========- -------------- (a)Spousal travel & entertainment costs represent the incremental costs incurred by the Company for travel and entertainment of spouses when accompanying the NEOs on Company related business trips.
(b)
Personal travel & entertainment costs represent the incremental costs incurred by the Company for the NEO's personal use of the Company's aircraft. (c)Tax reimbursement payments represent the actual cost to the Company of tax reimbursements made to the NEOs during
2006.2007.Two of the Company's executive officers,Mr. Sheffield,
and Mr. Kellum,directly or indirectly,holdheld working interests in wells of which the Company or a subsidiary is the operator. These interests were initially acquired in 1990 or earlier withthe executive officers'Mr. Sheffield’s personal funds pursuant to a program offered by theCompany'sCompany’s predecessor. As such,the holders participateMr. Sheffield participates in the costs and revenues attributable to that working interest in accordance with customary industry terms. During2006,2007, the aggregateamountsamount of the distributions made toMessrs.Mr. Sheffieldand Kellum were $34,920 and $15,365, respectively. 2006was $24,498.2007 GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS
The following table sets forth, for each NEO, information about grants of plan based awards during
2006:2007. In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the payouts shown in the “Threshold” column for the performance units (column (f)) reflect the lowest possible number of shares that would be issued, if any are paid. If the Company’s performance is below the threshold performance (i.e., a ranking of less than nine out of the applicable peer group), no shares will be paid.
Name
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts
under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
All Other Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock
or Units (2)
(#)
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and
Option Awards (3)
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
(a)
(b)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(l)
Scott D. Sheffield
02/26/2007
34,997
$
1,397,080
02/26/2007
8,750
34,998
87,495
$
1,482,515
Richard P. Dealy
02/26.2007
11,082
$
442,393
02/26/2007
2,771
11,083
27,708
$
469,476
Mark S. Berg
02/26/2007
8,166
$
325,987
02/26/2007
2,042
8,166
20,415
$
345,912
Chris J. Cheatwood
02/26/2007
8,166
$
325,987
02/26/2007
2,042
8,166
20,415
$
345,912
Timothy L. Dove
02/26/2007
15,165
$
605,387
02/26/2007
3,792
15,166
37,915
$
642,432
______________
Name Grant Date All Other Stock Awards: Number(1)
The amounts in columns (f), (g) and (h) represent the threshold, target and maximum payment levels with respect to the grants of
Grant Date Fair Valueperformance units in 2007. The number ofStockshares shown in the “Target” column assumes that the Company’s TSR performance results in a ranking of six out of the group of 11 companies that includes the Company andSharesits peer group. The payouts shown in the “Threshold” column indicate the lowest possible payout (other than zero), representing 25% ofStock or Units (1) Option Awards (#) ($) (a) (b) (i) (l) - --------------------- -------------- ---------------------------------- -----------------------------------Scott D. Sheffield 02/14/2006 61,000 $ 2,658,990 Richard P. Dealy 02/14/2006 13,100 $ 571,029 Chris J. Cheatwood 02/14/2006 12,000 $ 523,080 Timothy L. Dove 02/14/2006 24,100 $ 1,050,519 Danny L. Kellum 02/14/2006 12,000 $ 523,080the number of performance units subject to the award. If performance is below the threshold performance (i.e., a ranking of less than nine out of the applicable group of 11 companies), no shares are paid. The payouts shown in the “Maximum” column reflect the highest potential payout of 250% of the number of performance units awarded if the Company achieves the number one ranking within the 11 company group.
(2)
The amounts reported in this column are the number of restricted shares granted to each NEO in 2007.
(3)
The value of performance units was calculated using the fair value of the “Target” payout on the grant date and reflects the total amount that the Company would expense in its financial statements over the awards’ three-year performance period, in accordance with SFAS 123R. The assumptions used in calculating the assumed payout of performance units are discussed in footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table.
The
20062007 awards of performance units and restricted stockawardswere issued under theCompany'sCompany’s 2006 Long-Term IncentivePlan and represent retentionPlan. The material terms of these awards are described below. Defined terms impacting the accelerated settlement orservice condition awards. Plan-basedvesting of awardsgranted during 2006 consisted of restricted stock, which vestscan be found below infull three years after the date of grant, except as described in "Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control." 292006”Performance Units
The performance unit awards represent the right to receive between zero percent and 250 percent of the initial number of performance units awarded, contingent on the continued employment of the NEO and the Company’s achievement of the performance objective at the end of the performance period. The 2007 awards have a three-year performance period (January 2007 to December 2009), and the number of performance units earned will be based on the Company’s TSR ranking for this three-year period compared to the TSR of the ten other companies in the peer group, in accordance with the following table (at the time of grant in February 2007, there were eleven companies in the peer group, but one of the companies has been acquired):
TSR Rank
Against Peers
Percentage of Performance
Units Earned
1
250%
2
200%
3
175%
4
150%
5
125%
6
100%
7
75%
8
50%
9
25%
10
0%
11
0%
TSR means the annualized rate of return stockholders receive through stock price changes and the assumed reinvestment of dividends paid over the performance period.
Performance units earned will generally be paid in shares of the Company’s common stock no later than March 15th of the year following the year in which the performance period ends. The NEOs will also earn dividend equivalents on the performance units actually earned up to a maximum of the initial number awarded, which will be paid at the time the performance units are settled.
If a NEO’s employment with the Company is terminated during the performance period, the following rules will determine the number of performance units, if any, the NEO will earn: (1) if the NEO’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, the NEO will receive settlement of a number of performance units equal to the initial number of performance units awarded multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months during the performance period that the NEO was employed and the denominator of which is 36 (the “pro ration fraction”); (2) if the NEO’s employment is terminated due to his normal retirement on or after his attainment of age 60, the NEO will receive settlement of a number of performance units equal to the number of performance units that would have been earned if the NEO had continued employment through the end of the performance period multiplied by the pro ration fraction; (3) if the NEO’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, then (A) Messrs. Sheffield and Dove will receive a number of performance units equal to the number of performance units that would have been earned if they had continued employment through the end of the performance period, and (B) the other NEOs will receive settlement of a number of performance units equal to the number of performance units that would have been earned if the NEOs had continued employment through the end of the performance period multiplied by the pro ration fraction; and (4) if an NEO’s employment is terminated for any other reason, the NEO will not receive settlement of any of the performance units.
In the event of a change in control, the date of the change in control will be treated as the last day of the performance period and achievement of the performance objective will be measured based on the Company’s actual performance as of that date.
Additional information regarding the performance unit awards can be found above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of the Company’s Compensation Program - Long-Term Equity Incentives.”
Restricted Stock
In general, the restricted stock awards vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the NEO remaining employed with the Company continuously through the vesting date. While an NEO holds restricted shares, he is entitled to receive dividends on the shares at the same rate and time as other stockholders.
The vesting of the restricted shares will accelerate in full upon a change in control. In addition, if an NEO terminates employment prior to the vesting date, the following rules will apply: (1) if an NEO is terminated by the Company for cause or by the NEO without good reason, all of the restricted shares subject to the award will be forfeited to the Company, (2) if an NEO is terminated due to death, disability, normal retirement (on or after attainment of age 60), by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason, a number of restricted shares will vest equal to the total number of restricted shares subject to the award multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months following the date of grant during which the NEO was employed by the Company and the denominator of which is 36, and (3) notwithstanding clause (2) of this paragraph, if Messrs. Sheffield and Dove are terminated without cause or for good reason, all of the restricted shares subject to their awards will vest in full.
2007 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The following table sets forth, for each NEO, information
about equity awards outstandingregarding stock options, restricted stock and performance units that were held as of December 31,2006:2007, including awards that were granted prior to 2007:
Options Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date (1)
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
(#)
Market Value
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
that have
not Vested (2)
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Unit
or Other
Rights that
have not
Vested (3)
(#)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
have not
Vested (4)
($)
(a)
(b)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Scott D. Sheffield
20,000
$
18.96
02/14/2009
63,000
(5)
$
3,076,920
34,998
(8)
$
1,709,302
26,000
$
17.69
08/14/2009
61,000
(6)
$
2,979,240
60,000
$
18.30
02/19/2010
34,997
(7)
$
1,709,253
60,000
$
24.72
08/12/2010
60,000
$
24.25
02/18/2011
30,000
$
25.58
08/19/2011
Richard P. Dealy
4,166
$
12.50
08/16/2008
14,000
(5)
$
683,760
11,083
(8)
$
541,293
4,166
$
18.96
02/14/2009
13,100
(6)
$
639,804
9,333
$
17.69
08/14/2009
11,082
(7)
$
541,245
10,666
$
18.30
02/19/2010
10,500
$
24.72
08/12/2010
10,500
$
24.25
02/18/2011
5,250
$
25.58
08/19/2011
Mark S. Berg
16,000
(5)
$
781,440
8,166
(8)
$
398,827
12,000
(6)
$
586,080
8,166
(7)
$
398,827
Chris J. Cheatwood
7,666
$
17.69
08/14/2009
14,000
(5)
$
683,760
8,166
(8)
$
398,827
10,000
$
18.30
02/19/2010
12,000
(6)
$
586,080
13,333
$
24.72
08/12/2010
8,166
(7)
$
398,827
13,333
$
24.25
02/18/2011
10,000
$
25.58
08/19/2011
Timothy L. Dove
7,666
$
18.96
02/14/2009
24,000
(5)
$
1,172,160
15,166
(8)
740,707
20,000
$
17.69
08/14/2009
24,100
(6)
$
1,177,044
20,000
$
18.30
02/19/2010
15,165
(7)
$
740,659
13,333
$
24.72
08/12/2010
20,000
$
24.25
02/18/2011
10,000
$
25.58
08/19/2011
______________
Option Awards Stock Awards ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Name Number of Option Option Number of Market Value Vesting Date Securities Exercise Expiration Shares or of Shares Underlying Price Date(1)
Units of or Units Unexercised Stock that of Stock Options have not that have Vested not Vested (2) (#) Exercisable ($) (#) ($) (a) (b) (e) (f) (g) (h) - ------------------ --------------- --------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ------------Scott D. Sheffield 40,000 $ 18.96 02/14/2009 52,000 $ 17.69 08/14/2009 90,000 $ 18.30 02/19/2010 60,000 $ 24.72 08/12/2010 60,000 $ 24.25 02/18/2011 30,000 $ 25.58 08/19/2011 49,350 $ 1,958,702 02/16/2007 63,000 $ 2,500,470 02/15/2008 61,000 $ 2,421,090 02/14/2009 Richard P. Dealy 3,333 $ 12.44 08/23/2007 4,166 $ 7.88 02/15/2008 4,166 $ 12.50 08/16/2008 8,333 $ 18.96 02/14/2009 14,000 $ 17.69 08/14/2009 16,000 $ 18.30 02/19/2010 10,500 $ 24.72 08/12/2010 10,500 $ 24.25 02/18/2011 5,250 $ 25.58 08/19/2011 7,560 $ 300,056 02/16/2007 14,000 $ 555,660 02/15/2008 13,100 $ 519,939 02/14/2009 Chris J. 7,666 $ 17.69 08/14/2009 Cheatwood 20,000 $ 18.30 02/19/2010 20,000 $ 24.72 08/12/2010 20,000 $ 24.25 02/18/2011 10,000 $ 25.58 08/19/2011 15,750 $ 625,118 02/16/2007 14,000 $ 555,660 02/15/2008 12,000 $ 476,280 02/14/2009 Timothy L. Dove 7,666 $ 18.96 02/14/2009 20,000 $ 17.69 08/14/2009 30,000 $ 18.30 02/19/2010 20,000 $ 24.72 08/12/2010 20,000 $ 24.25 02/18/2011 10,000 $ 25.58 08/19/2011 16,800 $ 666,792 02/16/2007 24,000 $ 952,560 02/15/2008 24,100 $ 956,529 02/14/2009 Danny L. Kellum 15,750 $ 625,118 02/16/2007 14,000 $ 555,660 02/15/2008 12,000 $ 476,280 02/14/2009- -------------- (1)All outstanding option awards were fully vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2006. Under the terms of these stock option awards, the options vested as to one-third of the number of shares covered by the award on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, and the expiration date of each vested portion is the fifth anniversary of the date of vesting. The option expiration date reported in this column is the latest date any portion of the option will expire.
(2)
Based on the closing price of
$39.69$48.84 of theCompany'sCompany’s common stock on December29, 2006.31, 2007.302006
(3)
Represents the performance units that will vest on December 31, 2009 if and to the extent predetermined performance targets are achieved assuming that the “Target” performance targets are achieved.
(4)
Represents the market value of the unvested and unearned performance units based on the price per share of the Company’s common stock of $48.84, the closing market price on December 31, 2007, assuming that the “Target” performance targets are achieved.
(5)
This award of restricted stock vested in full on February 15, 2008, the third anniversary of the grant date, except that Mr. Berg’s vesting date is April 1, 2008, which is the third anniversary of his grant date of April 1, 2005, the first day of his employment with the Company.
(6)
This award of restricted stock vests in full on February 14, 2009, which is the third anniversary of the grant date. The vesting of this award will accelerate in full upon a change in control. In addition, the termination of the NEO’s employment prior to the vesting date will affect the vesting of the award as described above in the section entitled “2007 Grants of Plan Based Awards – Restricted Stock Awards.”
(7)
This award of restricted stock vests in full on February 26, 2010, which is the third anniversary of the grant date. The vesting of this award will accelerate in full upon a change in control. In addition, the termination of the NEO’s employment prior to the vesting date will affect the vesting of the award as described above in “2007 Grants of Plan Based Awards – Restricted Stock Awards.”
(8)
The vesting dates and conditions of this award of performance units are described above in “2007 Grants of Plan Based Awards – Performance Unit Awards.”
2007 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth, for each NEO, information about their
2006option exercises andlapsesthe lapse of restrictions on stockawards:awards during 2007:
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value Realized
on
Exercise (1)
($)
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on
Vesting (2)
($)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Scott D. Sheffield
76,000
$
2,214,894
49,350
$
1,991,273
Richard P. Dealy
21,667
$
797,448
7,560
$
305,046
Mark S. Berg
—
$
—
—
$
—
Chris J. Cheatwood
23,334
$
751,773
15,750
$
635,513
Timothy L. Dove
16,667
$
493,109
16,800
$
677,880
______________
Option Awards Stock Awards -------------------------------- -------------------------------- Name Number of Value Realized Number of Value Realized Shares Acquired on Shares Acquired on on Exercise Exercise(1)
on Vesting Vesting (2) (#) ($) (#) ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) - ------------------- --------------- -------------- --------------- --------------Scott D. Sheffield - $ - 12,000 $ 501,000 Richard P. Dealy - $ - 2,100 $ 87,675 Chris J. Cheatwood - $ - 4,000 $ 167,000 Timothy L. Dove 7,667 $ 186,340 4,000 $ 167,000 Danny L. Kellum 9,999 $ 170,279 4,000 $ 167,000- -------------- (1)The value realized per share acquired is based on the difference between the closing price of the
Company'sCompany’s common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options.
(2)
The value realized
per share vestedis based on the closing price of$41.75$40.35 of theCompany'sCompany’s common stock onAugust 18, 2006,February 16, 2007, the date of vesting.2006PENSION BENEFITS
The Company does not sponsor or maintain any plans that provide for specified retirement payments or benefits, such as tax-qualified defined benefit plans or supplemental executive retirement plans, for its NEOs.
2007 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The
Company'sCompany’s NEOs participate in a Company-sponsored defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The following table provides, for each NEO, information about their participation in theCompany'sCompany’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan:
Name
Executive
Contributions in
Last FY (1)
($)
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY (2)
($)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY (3)
($)
Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE (4)
($)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(f)
Scott D. Sheffield
$
85,000
$
85,000
$
210,411
$
1,605,108
Richard P. Dealy
$
54,000
$
36,000
$
45,073
$
765,400
Mark S. Berg
$
33,000
$
33,000
$
(5,549
)
$
152,523
Chris J. Cheatwood
$
51,000
$
34,000
$
29,289
$
746,490
Timothy L. Dove
$
52,500
$
52,500
$
66,355
$
968,556
______________
Name Executive Registrant Aggregate Aggregate Contributions(1)
The amounts in
Contributions in Earnings in Balance at Last Last FY Last FY (1) Last FY (2) FYE (3) ($) ($) ($) ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (f) - ------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------Scott D. Sheffield $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 73,051 $ 1,224,697 Richard P. Dealy $ 54,000 $ 36,000 $ 62,944 $ 630,327 Chris J. Cheatwood $ 51,000 $ 34,000 $ 91,257 $ 632,201 Timothy L. Dove $ 52,500 $ 52,500 $ 82,821 $ 797,202 Danny L. Kellum $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 48,098 $ 599,359- -------------- (1) Registrant contributionsthis column aredisclosed in column (i), andalsoreflectedincluded in thetotal compensation disclosed inSalary or Bonus column(j),of theSummary“Summary Compensation Table.”
(2)
The
portion representing above-market earnings is disclosedamounts in this column(h), andare alsoreflectedincluded in thetotal compensation disclosed inAll Other Compensation column(j),of theSummary“Summary Compensation Table.”
(3)
The amounts in this column represent aggregate earnings that accrued during 2007 on amounts of salary and/or bonus deferred at the election of the NEO and the contributions made by the Company for each NEO pursuant to the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The following amounts of such earnings are also reported as above-market returns in the Change in Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column of the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Sheffield, $129,518; Mr. Dealy, $3,294 and Mr. Dove, $14,027.
(4)
The aggregate
balancebalances for Messrs. Sheffield, Dealy, Berg, Cheatwood and Dove include amounts ofeach executive officer's plan account reflects above-market earnings$14,348, $34,397, $12,963, $63,992 andthe Company's contributions also$46,380, respectively, which are reported as compensation incolumns (h) and (i), respectively, and included inthetotal compensation reported in column (j), of the Summary“Summary CompensationTable.Table” for 2006.31The non-qualified deferred compensation plan allows each participant to contribute up to 25 percent of base salary and 100 percent of annual incentive bonus payments.
TheIn addition, the Company provides a matching contribution of 100 percent of theparticipant'sparticipant’s contributionlimitedup to the first ten percent ofthean executiveofficer'sofficer’s base salary. TheCompany'sCompany’s matching contribution vests immediately. The non-qualified deferred compensation plan permits each executive officer to make investment allocation choices for both the executiveofficer's contributionofficer’s contributions and the Companymatch tomatching contributions made on the executive’s behalf among the designated mutual funds and/or to a self-directed brokerage account offered as investment options under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company retains the right to maintain these investment choices as hypothetical investments or to actually invest in the executiveofficer'sofficer’s investment choices. To date, the Company has chosen to actually invest the funds in the investment options selected by the executive officers so that the investment returns are funded, but such funds remain assets subject to the claims of theCompany'sCompany’s general creditors. An executive is permitted to changetheirhis investment choices at anytime.Participants
may choosegenerally are not permitted toreceive a distribution of their vested benefitsmake withdrawals from the non-qualified deferred compensation plan prior to their termination of employment with the Company. However, a participant may be entitled to make a withdrawal prior to his termination of employment (1) if the plan administrator determines that the participant has experienced an unforeseeable financial emergency, to the extent necessary to satisfy the participant’s needs, or (2) once a year pursuant to the plan’s early withdrawal procedures. Upon a participant’s termination of employment, the participant’s benefits under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan shall be paid to him as soon as administratively practicable(i) afterfollowing (a) the date ofseparation from service withtheCompanyparticipant’s termination of employment or(ii) after January 1(b) if elected by the participant, the first day of the plan year following the date ofseparation from service withtheCompany.participant’s termination. Aparticipant'sparticipant’s vested benefits may, at the option of the participant, be distributed in one cash lump sum payment, in five annual installments or in ten annual installments.In the event of a change in control, the entire amount credited to a participant under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan will be paid to the participant in a single lump sum cash payment.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The Company is party to severance agreements and change in control agreements with its executive officers.
The forms of severance and change in control agreements were previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 17, 2005.Salaries and annual incentive bonuses are set by the Compensation Committee independent of these agreements and the Compensation Committee can increase or decrease base salaries at its discretion.The severance agreements provide that, if the executive terminates employment for good reason
(which generally includes a demotion or significant pay reduction, and for Mr. Sheffield also includes his not being reelected as a director)or if an executiveofficer'sofficer’s employment with the Company terminates other than for cause, death, disability or normal retirement, the Company must pay the executive officer a separation payment in addition to earned salary and vested benefits. The separation payment is an amount equal to the sum of (1) one times the executiveofficer'sofficer’s base salary (three times base salary for Mr. Sheffield and 2.5 times base salary in the case of Mr. Dove), (2) 18 times the monthly executiveofficer'sofficer’s cost to continue coverage for himself and his eligible dependents under theCompany'sCompany’s group medical plans (36 times the monthly cost in the case of Mr. Sheffield and 30 times the monthly cost in the case of Mr. Dove), and (3) one-twelfth of the executiveofficer'sofficer’s base salary if the date of termination is less than 30 days following the notice of termination and the executiveofficer'sofficer’s employment is terminated by the Company. In the case of Messrs. Sheffield and Dove, the severance agreements also provide for the immediate vesting of certain awards under theCompany'sCompany’s 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The severance agreements terminate upon a change in control of the Company.The change in control agreements provide that, if the executive officer terminates employment for good reason
(which generally includes an adverse change in duties or a reduction in base salary, target annual incentive bonus, equity awards or benefits)or if an executiveofficer'sofficer’s employment with the Company terminates other than for cause, death, disability or normal retirement, in either case in connection with or after a change in control, the Company must pay the executive officer a separation payment and provide continued group medical coverage at a cost equivalent to a similarly situated active employee for approximately three years (in the case of Messrs. Sheffield and Dove, until the date the executive is eligible for full medical benefits under the provisions of Medicare), in addition to paying earned salary and vested benefits. In addition, all the executiveofficer'sofficer’s awards under theCompany'sCompany’s 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan will fully vest. The separation payment is an amount equal to the sum of (1) 2.99 times the sum of the executiveofficer'sofficer’s base salary and a defined target bonus determined in accordance with the terms of each agreement, (2) a pro-rated portion of the defined target bonus based on the days elapsed in that calendar year, and (3) one-twelfth of the executive32officer'sofficer’s base salary if the date of termination is less than 30 days following the notice of termination and the executiveofficer'sofficer’s employment is terminated by the Company. If the Company terminates an executive officer without cause following a potential change in control(as defined in the agreements)and if a change in control occurs within 12 months, the executive officer will be entitled upon the change in control to the payments that would have been made if the executive had continued as an executive officer until the change in control, as well as to a payment equal to the value of the executiveofficer'sofficer’s equity-based awards that did not vest when his employment was terminated. If, after a change in control, an executive officer terminates employment because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, but is not otherwise entitled to terminate employment for good reason, then the Company must pay the executive officer a reduced separation payment equal to his annualized base salary, in addition to earned salary and vested benefits, and provide continued coverage for one year under group medical benefit plans. The change in control agreements also obligate the Company to make the executive officers whole (that is, provide a"gross-up"“gross-up”) for excise taxes that may be imposed on payments under the change in control agreements by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. The change in control agreements continue for two years following a change in control that occurs during the term of the agreement.Both the severance agreements and the change in control agreements provide for a payment of one times the executive
officer'sofficer’s base salary in the event of his death, disability or retirement. All payments, other than continued medical benefits, received under both the severance agreements and the change in control agreements are distributed as a lump sum.33Definitions. For purposes of the severance and change in control agreements, the terms set forth below generally have the meanings described below:
A “change in control” generally includes the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (1) a person or group acquires 20 percent or more of the Company’s common stock, except for acquisitions directly from the Company and acquisitions by an employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by the Company; (2) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors changes, other than new members elected or nominated by at least a majority of the then-current board, absent an election contest or similar proxy dispute; (3) the Company merges or engages in a similar transaction, or sells all or substantially all of its assets, unless the Company’s stockholders prior to the transaction own more than half of the voting interest of the Company or the resulting entity (in substantially the same ratios) after the transaction, and neither of the events in items (1) and (2) above has occurred for the Company or the resulting entity; or (4) the Company’s stockholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
A “potential change in control” will be deemed to have occurred if (1) a person or group announces publicly an intention to effect a change in control, or commences an action that, if successful, could reasonably be expected to result in a change in control; (2) the Company enters into an agreement that would constitute a change in control; or (3) any other event occurs which the Board declares to be a potential change in control.
“Cause” generally means any of the following circumstances: (1) the officer’s failure to substantially perform his duties, unless the failure is due to physical or mental incapacity, or to comply with a material written policy of the Company; (2) the officer’s engaging in an act of gross misconduct that results in, or is intended to result in, material damage to the Company’s business or reputation; (3) the officer’s failure to cooperate in connection with an investigation or proceeding into the business practices or operations of the Company; or (4) the officer’s conviction of a felony or a crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or financial misconduct. In addition, in the severance agreements, “cause” includes a material violation by the officer of the provisions of the confidentiality and non-solicitation restrictions in the agreement.
“Good reason,” in the change in control agreements, generally means any of the following circumstances: (1) the assignment to the officer of duties materially inconsistent his position as compared to his duties immediately prior to the potential change in control or change in control; (2) a reduction in the officer’s base salary; or (3) the failure to provide the officer the opportunity to earn annual bonuses and long-term incentive compensation, and to participate in retirement, deferred compensation, medical and similar benefits, all in a manner consistent with the Company’s then existing practices.
The definition of “good reason” in Mr. Sheffield’s and Mr. Dove’s severance agreements is substantially similar to the definition in the change in control agreement, except that, in Mr. Sheffield’s agreement, “good reason” also includes the failure of the Company to nominate him for re-election to the Board of Directors, or any failure of the stockholders to re-elect him to the Board, unless due to his death, disability, termination for cause or voluntary resignation. In the severance agreements for officers other than Messrs. Sheffield and Dove, “good reason” generally means a demotion of the officer to an officer position junior to his then existing position, or to a non-officer position, or a reduction in base salary that is not a company-wide reduction and that is greater than 80 percent, or any reduction in base salary that is greater than 65 percent.
The following tables quantify the payments and benefits provided to the NEO’s upon the events specified below. The value of the accelerated vesting or settlement of equity awards is based on the closing price of $48.84 of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2007.
Scott D. Sheffield.The following table shows, as of December 31,
2006,2007, the estimated potential payments and benefits that would be received by Mr. Sheffield upon the termination of his employment in each of the circumstances indicated in the table.
Benefits and
Payments
Upon
Termination (1)
Voluntary
Termination
Termination
Not for Cause
Termination
for Cause
Termination for Good
Reason
Normal
Retirement
Death/Disability
Change in
Control
Termination
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation:
Restricted Stock (2)
$
—
$
7,765,413
$
—
$
7,765,413
$
5,201,362
$
5,201,362
$
7,765,413
Performance Units (3)
$
—
$
1,709,302
$
—
$
1,709,302
$
569,767
$
569,767
$
1,709,302
Benefits & Perquisites:
Severance Payment
$
—
$
2,550,000
$
—
$
2,550,000
$
850,000
$
850,000
$
5,058,084
Prorated Bonus Payment (4)
$
—
$
850,000
$
—
$
850,000
$
850,000
$
850,000
$
841,667
Medical Benefit Continuation
$
—
$
31,633
$
—
$
31,633
$
—
$
—
$
319,803
280G Reimbursement
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Pay in lieu of 30-day Notice (5)
$
—
$
70,833
$
—
$
70,833
$
—
$
—
$
70,833
Unused Vacation (6)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Total
$
—
$
12,977,181
$
—
$
12,977,181
$
7,471,129
$
7,471,129
$
15,765,102
______________
Benefits and Payments Change in Upon Voluntary Termination Termination Termination for Normal Control Termination(1)
Termination Not for Cause for Cause Good Reason Retirement Death/Disability Termination - ---------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------Long-Term Incentive Compensation: Restricted Stock (2) $ - $ 6,880,262 $ - $ 6,880,262 $ 4,089,578 $ 4,089,578 $ 6,880,262 Benefits & Perquisites: Severance Payment $ - $ 2,550,000 $ - $ 2,550,000 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 4,983,333 Prorated Bonus Payment (3) $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 816,667 Medical Benefit Continuation $ - $ 31,175 $ - $ 31,175 $ - $ - $ 270,047 280G Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pay in lieu of$ 30-day Notice (4) $ - 70,833 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,833 Unused Vacation (5) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - --------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total $ - $ 10,382,270 $ - $ 10,311,437 $ 5,789,578 $ 5,789,578 $13,021,142 ========= ============ =========== ============= ============ ============ ===========- -------------- (1)The benefits and payments quantified in the table do not contemplate the payments that the Company is obligated to make to the executive officer (i) if the Company terminates the executive officer without cause following a potential change in control
andor a change in control occurs within 12 months following the termination, or (ii) if the executive officer terminates employment following a change in control because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, in both cases as described in the summary of the change in control agreements set forth above. Additionally, the benefits and payments quantified herein have been determined as of December 31,2006,2007, and therefore do not contemplate the effect on the long-term incentive compensation and 280G reimbursement components resulting from the vesting in February20072008 of49,35063,000 shares of restricted stock and the grant in February20072008 of34,99738,479 shares of restricted stock and34,99838,478 performance units.
(2)
Unvested restricted stock awards automatically vest
in fullupon a change in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested restricted stock awards also automatically vestin fullupon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. In the case of Normal Retirement, Death or Disability, vesting of the award is accelerated pro rata to the end of the month of termination.On February 26, 2007,
(3)
Unvested performance unit awards automatically vest upon a change in control with the
Compensation Committee amendedaward of shares subject to performance measured on thetermsdate of theexecutive officer's February 2006 restricted stock grantchange in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested performance unit awards also automatically vest with the award of shares subject toprovideperformance measured at the end of the three-year performance period upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. In the case of Normal Retirement, performance unit awards vest pro ratavesting in certain termination events under whichto therestricted stock would have been forfeited underend of theoriginal terms. In quantifyingmonth with thepotential payments upon termination,award of shares subject to performance measured at thetable assumes that these more favorable provisions were in effect asend ofDecember 31, 2006. (3)the three-year performance period. Performance unit awards vest pro rata to the end of the month with shares paid at target within 75 days following Death or Disability. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed “Target” shares will be issued.
(4)
Other than in connection with a Change in Control Termination, payment of a bonus is subject to Compensation Committee discretion. This table assumes the Compensation Committee chose to make the payments indicated.
(4)
(5)
This amount is payable only if employment is terminated by the Company and the date of termination is less than 30 days after the date of notice of termination.
(5)
(6)
This amount equals the difference in value between the vacation time that was accrued and the vacation time that had been used during the year to the date of termination.
34Richard P. Dealy.The following table shows, as of December 31,
2006,2007, the estimated potential payments and benefits that would be received by Mr. Dealy upon the termination of his employment in each of the circumstances indicated in the table.
Benefits and
Payments
Upon
Termination (1)
Voluntary
Termination
Termination
Not for Cause
Termination
for Cause
Termination for Good
Reason
Normal
Retirement
Death/Disability
Change in
Control
Termination
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation:
Restricted Stock (2)
$
—
$
1,187,056
$
—
$
1,187,056
$
1,187,056
$
1,187,056
$
1,864,809
Performance Units (3)
$
—
$
180,431
$
—
$
180,431
$
180,431
$
180,431
$
541,293
Benefits & Perquisites:
Severance Payment
$
—
$
360,000
$
—
$
360,000
$
360,000
$
360,000
$
1,808,950
Prorated Bonus Payment (4)
$
—
$
288,000
$
—
$
288,000
$
288,000
$
288,000
$
245,000
Medical Benefit Continuation
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
—
$
40,310
280G Reimbursement
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
727,743
Pay in lieu of 30-day Notice (5)
$
—
$
30,000
$
—
$
30,000
$
—
$
—
$
30,000
Unused Vacation (6)
$
5,192
$
5,192
$
5,192
$
5,192
$
5,192
$
5,192
$
5,192
Total
$
5,192
$
2,073,138
$
5,192
$
2,073,138
$
2,020,679
$
2,020,679
$
5,263,297
______________
Benefits and Payments Termination Change in Upon Voluntary Termination Termination for Good Normal Control Termination(1)
Termination Not for Cause for Cause Reason Retirement Death/Disability Termination - ---------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------Long-Term Incentive Compensation: Restricted Stock (2) $ - $ 775,860 $ - $ - $ 775,860 $ 775,860 $ 1,375,655 Benefits & Perquisites: Severance Payment $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 1,620,580 Prorated Bonus Payment (3) $ - $ 252,000 $ - $ 252,000 $ 252,000 $ 252,000 $ 182,000 Medical Benefit Continuation $ - $ 22,069 $ - $ 22,069 $ - $ - $ 39,529 280G Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pay in lieu of$ 30-day Notice (4) $ - 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 Unused Vacation (5) $ 11,769 $ 11,769 $ 11,769 $ 11,769 $ 11,769 $ 11,769 $ 11,769 --------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total $ 11,769 $ 1,451,698 $ 11,769 $ 645,838 $ 1,399,629 $ 1,399,629 $ 3,259,533 ========= ============ =========== ============= ============ ============ ===========- -------------- (1)The benefits and payments quantified in the table do not contemplate the payments that the Company is obligated to make to the executive officer (i) if the Company terminates the executive officer without cause following a potential change in control
andor a change in control occurs within 12 months following the termination, or (ii) if the executive officer terminates employment following a change in control because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, in both cases as described in the summary of the change in control agreements set forth above. Additionally, the benefits and payments quantified herein have been determined as of December 31,2006,2007, and therefore do not contemplate the effect on the long-term incentive compensation and 280G reimbursement components resulting from the vesting in February20072008 of7,56014,000 shares of restricted stock and the grant in February20072008 of11,08212,643 shares of restricted stock and11,08312,643 performance units.
(2)
Unvested restricted stock awards automatically vest
in fullupon a change in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. In the case of a Termination Not for Cause, a Termination for Good Reason, or Normal Retirement, Death or Disability, vesting of the award is accelerated pro rata to the end of the month of termination.On February 26, 2007,
(3)
Unvested performance unit awards automatically vest upon a change in control with the
Compensation Committee amendedaward of shares subject to performance measured on thetermsdate of theexecutive officer's February 2006 restricted stock grant to provide forchange in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested performance unit awards also automatically vest pro ratavesting in certain termination events under whichto therestricted stock would have been forfeited underend of theoriginal terms.month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. Inquantifyingthepotential payments upon termination,case of Normal Retirement, performance unit awards vest pro rata to thetable assumes that these more favorable provisions were in effect asend ofDecember 31, 2006. (3)the month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period. Performance unit awards vest pro rata to the end of the month with shares paid at target within 75 days following Death or Disability. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed “Target” shares will be issued.
(4)
Other than in connection with a Change in Control Termination, payment of a bonus is subject to Compensation Committee discretion. This table assumes the Compensation Committee chose to make the payments indicated.
(4)
(5)
This amount is payable only if employment is terminated by the Company and the date of termination is less than 30 days after the date of notice of termination.
(5)
(6)
This amount equals the difference in value between the vacation time that was accrued and the vacation time that had been used during the year to the date of termination.
35Chris J. Cheatwood.Mark S. Berg.The following table shows, as of December 31,
2006,2007, the estimated potential payments and benefits that would be received by Mr.CheatwoodBerg upon the termination of his employment in each of the circumstances indicated in the table.
Benefits and
Payments
Upon
Termination (1)
Voluntary
Termination
Termination
Not for Cause
Termination
for Cause
Termination for Good
Reason
Normal
Retirement
Death/Disability
Change in
Control
Termination
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation:
Restricted Stock (2)
$
—
$
1,163,515
$
—
$
1,163,515
$
1,163,515
$
1,163,515
$
1,766,347
Performance Units (3)
$
—
$
132,942
$
—
$
132,942
$
132,942
$
132,942
$
398,827
Benefits & Perquisites:
Severance Payment
$
—
$
340,000
$
—
$
340,000
$
340,000
$
340,000
$
1,670,911
Prorated Bonus Payment (4)
$
—
$
221,000
$
—
$
221,000
$
221,000
$
221,000
$
218,833
Medical Benefit Continuation
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
—
$
40,310
280G Reimbursement
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
755,611
Pay in lieu of 30-day Notice (5)
$
—
$
28,333
$
—
$
28,333
$
—
$
—
$
28,333
Unused Vacation (6)
$
15,201
$
15,201
$
15,201
$
15,201
$
15,201
$
15,201
$
15,201
Total
$
15,201
$
1,923,450
$
15,201
$
1,923,450
$
1,872,658
$
1,872,658
$
4,894,373
______________
Benefits and Payments Termination Change in Upon Voluntary Termination Termination for Good Normal Control Termination(1)
Termination Not for Cause for Cause Reason Retirement Death/Disability Termination - ---------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------Long-Term Incentive Compensation: Restricted Stock (2) $ - $ 1,070,201 $ - $ - $ 1,070,201 $ 1,070,201 $ 1,657,058 Benefits & Perquisites: Severance Payment $ - $ 340,000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 1,639,018 Prorated Bonus Payment (3) $ - $ 221,000 $ - $ 221,000 $ 221,000 $ 221,000 $ 208,167 Medical Benefit Continuation $ - $ 22,459 $ - $ 22,459 $ - $ - $ 39,851 280G Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pay in lieu of$ 30-day Notice (4) $ - 28,333 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,333 Unused Vacation (5) $ 6,578 $ 6,578 $ 6,578 $ 6,578 $ 6,578 $ 6,578 $ 6,578 --------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total $ 6,578 $ 1,688,571 $ 6,578 $ 590,037 $ 1,637,779 $ 1,637,779 $ 3,579,005 ========= ============ =========== ============= ============ ============ ===========- -------------- (1)The benefits and payments quantified in the table do not contemplate the payments that the Company is obligated to make to the executive officer (i) if the Company terminates the executive officer without cause following a potential change in control
andor a change in control occurs within 12 months following the termination, or (ii) if the executive officer terminates employment following a change in control because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, in both cases as described in the summary of the change in control agreements set forth above. Additionally, the benefits and payments quantified herein have been determined as of December 31,2006,2007, and therefore do not contemplate the effect on the long-term incentive compensation and 280G reimbursement components resulting from the vesting inFebruary 2007April 2008 of15,75016,000 shares of restricted stock and the grant in February20072008 of8,1668,520 shares of restricted stock and8,1668,520 performance units.
(2)
Unvested restricted stock awards automatically vest
in fullupon a change in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. In the case of a Termination Not for Cause, a Termination for Good Reason, or Normal Retirement, Death or Disability, vesting of the award is accelerated pro rata to the end of the month of termination.On February 26, 2007,
(3)
Unvested performance unit awards automatically vest upon a change in control with the
Compensation Committee amendedaward of shares subject to performance measured on thetermsdate of theexecutive officer's February 2006 restricted stock grant to provide forchange in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested performance unit awards also automatically vest pro ratavesting in certain termination events under whichto therestricted stock would have been forfeited underend of theoriginal terms.month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. Inquantifyingthepotential payments upon termination,case of Normal Retirement, performance unit awards vest pro rata to thetable assumes that these more favorable provisions were in effect asend ofDecember 31, 2006. (3)the month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period. Performance unit awards vest pro rata to the end of the month with shares paid at target within 75 days following Death or Disability. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed “Target” shares will be issued.
(4)
Other than in connection with a Change in Control Termination, payment of a bonus is subject to Compensation Committee discretion. This table assumes the Compensation Committee chose to make the payments indicated.
(4)
(5)
This amount is payable only if employment is terminated by the Company and the date of termination is less than 30 days after the date of notice of termination.
(5)
(6)
This amount equals the difference in value between the vacation time that was accrued and the vacation time that had been used during the year to the date of termination.
36Timothy L. Dove.Chris J. Cheatwood.The following table shows, as of December 31,
2006,2007, the estimated potential payments and benefits that would be received by Mr.DoveCheatwood upon the termination of his employment in each of the circumstances indicated in the table.
Benefits and
Payments
Upon
Termination (1)
Voluntary
Termination
Termination
Not for Cause
Termination
for Cause
Termination for Good
Reason
Normal
Retirement
Death/Disability
Change in
Control
Termination
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation:
Restricted Stock (2)
$
—
$
1,114,675
$
—
$
1,114,675
$
1,114,675
$
1,114,675
$
1,668,667
Performance Units (3)
$
—
$
132,942
$
—
$
132,942
$
132,942
$
132,942
$
398,827
Benefits & Perquisites:
Severance Payment
$
—
$
340,000
$
—
$
340,000
$
340,000
$
340,000
$
1,670,910
Prorated Bonus Payment (4)
$
—
$
221,000
$
—
$
221,000
$
221,000
$
221,000
$
218,833
Medical Benefit Continuation
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
22,459
$
—
$
—
$
39,851
280G Reimbursement
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Pay in lieu of 30-day Notice (5)
$
—
$
28,333
$
—
$
28,333
$
—
$
—
$
28,333
Unused Vacation (6)
$
9,481
$
9,481
$
9,481
$
9,481
$
9,481
$
9,481
$
9,481
Total
$
9,481
$
1,868,890
$
9,481
$
1,868,890
$
1,818,098
$
1,818,098
$
4,034,902
______________
Benefits and Payments Termination Change in Upon Voluntary Termination Termination for Good Normal Control Termination(1)
Termination Not for Cause for Cause Reason Retirement Death/Disability Termination - ---------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------Long-Term Incentive Compensation: Restricted Stock (2) $ - $ 2,575,881 $ - $ 2,575,881 $ 1,492,820 $ 1,492,820 $ 2,575,881 Benefits & Perquisites: Severance Payment $ - $ 1,312,500 $ - $ 1,312,500 $ 525,000 $ 525,000 $ 2,696,482 Prorated Bonus Payment (3) $ - $ 446,250 $ - $ 446,250 $ 446,250 $ 446,250 $ 376,833 Medical Benefit Continuation $ - $ 39,023 $ - $ 39,023 $ - $ - $ 498,230 280G Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pay in lieu of$ 30-day Notice (4) $ - 43,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,750 Unused Vacation (5) $ 18,678 $ 18,678 $ 18,678 $ 18,678 $ 18,678 $ 18,678 $ 18,678 --------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total $ 18,678 $ 4,436,082 $ 18,678 $ 4,392,332 $ 2,482,748 $ 2,482,748 $ 6,209,854 ========= ============ =========== ============= ============ ============ ===========- -------------- (1)The benefits and payments quantified in the table do not contemplate the payments that the Company is obligated to make to the executive officer (i) if the Company terminates the executive officer without cause following a potential change in control
andor a change in control occurs within 12 months following the termination, or (ii) if the executive officer terminates employment following a change in control because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, in both cases as described in the summary of the change in control agreements set forth above. Additionally, the benefits and payments quantified herein have been determined as of December 31,2006,2007, and therefore do not contemplate the effect on the long-term incentive compensation and 280G reimbursement components resulting from the vesting in February20072008 of16,80014,000 shares of restricted stock and the grant in February20072008 of15,1668,520 shares of restricted stock and15,1668,520 performance units.
(2)
Unvested restricted stock awards automatically vest
in fullupon a change in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated.Unvested restricted stock awards also automatically vest in full uponIn the case of a Termination Not for Cause,ora Termination for GoodReason. In the case ofReason, or Normal Retirement, Death or Disability, vesting of the award is accelerated pro rata to the end of the month of termination.On February 26, 2007,
(3)
Unvested performance unit awards automatically vest upon a change in control with the
Compensation Committee amendedaward of shares subject to performance measured on thetermsdate of theexecutive officer's February 2006 restricted stock grant to provide forchange in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested performance unit awards also automatically vest pro ratavesting in certain termination events under whichto therestricted stock would have been forfeited underend of theoriginal terms.month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. Inquantifyingthepotential payments upon termination,case of Normal Retirement, performance unit awards vest pro rata to thetable assumes that these more favorable provisions were in effect asend ofDecember 31, 2006. (3)the month with the award of shares subject to performance measured at the end of the three-year performance period. Performance unit awards vest pro rata to the end of the month with shares paid at target within 75 days following Death or Disability. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed “Target” shares will be issued.
(4)
Other than in connection with a Change in Control Termination, payment of a bonus is subject to Compensation Committee discretion. This table assumes the Compensation Committee chose to make the payments indicated.
(4)
(5)
This amount is payable only if employment is terminated by the Company and the date of termination is less than 30 days after the date of notice of termination.
(5)
(6)
This amount equals the difference in value between the vacation time that was accrued and the vacation time that had been used during the year to the date of termination.
37DannyTimothy L.
Kellum.Dove.The following table shows, as of December 31,2006,2007, the estimated potential payments and benefits that would be received by Mr.KellumDove upon the termination of his employment in each of the circumstances indicated in the table.
Benefits and
Payments
Upon
Termination (1)
Voluntary
Termination
Termination
Not for Cause
Termination
for Cause
Termination for Good
Reason
Normal
Retirement
Death/Disability
Change in
Control
Termination
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation:
Restricted Stock (2)
$
—
$
3,089,863
$
—
$
3,089,863
$
2,031,988
$
2,031,988
$
3,089,863
Performance Units (3)
$
—
$
740,707
$
—
$
740,707
$
246,902
$
246,902
$
740,707
Benefits & Perquisites:
Severance Payment
$
—
$
1,312,500
$
—
$
1,312,500
$
525,000
$
525,000
$
2,861,678
Prorated Bonus Payment (4)
$
—
$
446,250
$
—
$
446,250
$
446,250
$
446,250
$
432,083
Medical Benefit Continuation
$
—
$
38,746
$
—
$
38,746
$
—
$
—
$
602,242
280G Reimbursement
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,240,917
Pay in lieu of 30-day Notice (5)
$
—
$
43,750
$
—
$
43,750
$
—
$
—
$
43,750
Unused Vacation (6)
$
7,320
$
7,320
$
7,320
$
7,320
$
7,320
$
7,320
$
7,320
Total
$
7,320
$
5,679,136
$
7,320
$
5,679,136
$
3,257,460
$
3,257,460
$
9,018,560
______________
Benefits and Payments Termination Change in Upon Voluntary Termination Termination for Good Normal Control Termination(1)
Termination Not for Cause for Cause Reason Retirement Death/Disability Termination - ---------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------Long-Term Incentive Compensation: Restricted Stock (2) $ - $ 1,070,201 $ - $ - $ 1,070,201 $ 1,070,201 $ 1,657,058 Benefits & Perquisites: Severance Payment $ - $ 340,000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 1,639,018 Prorated Bonus Payment (3) $ - $ 221,000 $ - $ 221,000 $ 221,000 $ 221,000 $ 208,167 Medical Benefit Continuation $ - $ 15,812 $ - $ 15,812 $ - $ - $ 27,309 280G Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pay in lieu of$ 30-day Notice (4) $ - 28,333 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,333 Unused Vacation (5) $ 14,875 $ 14,875 $ 14,875 $ 14,875 $ 14,875 $ 14,875 $ 14,875 --------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total $ 14,875 $ 1,690,221 $ 14,875 $ 591,687 $ 1,646,076 $ 1,646,076 $ 3,574,760 ========= ============ =========== ============= ============ ============ ===========- -------------- (1)The benefits and payments quantified in the table do not contemplate the payments that the Company is obligated to make to the executive officer (i) if the Company terminates the executive officer without cause following a potential change in control
andor a change in control occurs within 12 months following the termination, or (ii) if the executive officer terminates employment following a change in control because he is required to relocate more than 50 miles, in both cases as described in the summary of the change in control agreements set forth above. Additionally, the benefits and payments quantified herein have been determined as of December 31,2006,2007, and therefore do not contemplate the effect on the long-term incentive compensation and 280G reimbursement components resulting from the vesting in February20072008 of15,75024,000 shares of restricted stock and the grant in February20072008 of8,16621,438 shares of restricted stock and8,16621,438 performance units.
(2)
Unvested restricted stock awards automatically vest
in fullupon a change in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated.In the case ofUnvested restricted stock awards also automatically vest upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for GoodReason, orReason. In the case of Normal Retirement, Death or Disability, vesting of the award is accelerated pro rata to the end of the month of termination.On February 26, 2007,
(3)
Unvested performance unit awards automatically vest upon a change in control with the
Compensation Committee amendedaward of shares subject to performance measured on thetermsdate of theexecutive officer's February 2006 restricted stock grantchange in control, regardless of whether employment is subsequently terminated. Unvested performance unit awards also automatically vest with the award of shares subject toprovideperformance measured at the end of the three-year performance period upon a Termination Not for Cause or a Termination for Good Reason. In the case of Normal Retirement, performance unit awards vest pro ratavesting in certain termination events under whichto therestricted stock would have been forfeited underend of theoriginal terms. In quantifyingmonth with thepotential payments upon termination,award of shares subject to performance measured at thetable assumes that these more favorable provisions were in effect asend ofDecember 31, 2006. (3)the three-year performance period. Performance unit awards vest pro rata to the end of the month with shares paid at target within 75 days following Death or Disability. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed “Target” shares will be issued.
(4)
Other than in connection with a Change in Control Termination, payment of a bonus is subject to Compensation Committee discretion. This table assumes the Compensation Committee chose to make the payments indicated.
(4)
(5)
This amount is payable only if employment is terminated by the Company and the date of termination is less than 30 days after the date of notice of termination.
(5)
(6)
This amount equals the difference in value between the vacation time that was accrued and the vacation time that had been used during the year to the date of termination.
38COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During
2006,2007, no member of the Compensation Committee served as an executive officer of the Company. During2006,2007, there were no Compensation Committee interlocks with other companies.COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this Compensation and Management Development Committee Report shall not be deemed to be
"soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be"filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information.The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation and Management Development Committee of
The Board of Directors
Edison C. Buchanan, Chairman
James R. Baroffio, Member
Andrew D. Lundquist, Member
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr., Member
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this Audit Committee Report and references in this Proxy Statement to the independence of the Audit Committee members shall not be deemed to be
"soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be"filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.The Audit
Committee'sCommittee’s purpose is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of theCompany'sCompany’s internal controls, financial statements and the audit process. The Board of Directors, in its business judgment, has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent as required under the listing standards of the NYSE.Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the
Company'sCompany’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for auditingmanagement's assessment thattheCompany maintains effectiveCompany’s internal controls over financial reporting. While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter and management and the independent auditors for the Company are accountable to the Audit Committee, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that theCompany'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,Communication with Audit Committees,as currently in effect. The Audit Committee has received the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent
39auditors required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independent Discussions with Audit Committees, as currently in effect. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the performance of other non-audit services by the independent auditors is compatible with maintaining theauditors'auditors’ independence and has discussed with the auditors theauditors'auditors’ independence.Based on the reports and discussions described in this Audit Committee Report, and subject to the limitations on the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to below and in the charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006,2007, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also selected Ernst & Young LLP as theCompany'sCompany’s independent auditors for2007.2008.Although determined to be financially literate (as defined by the SEC rules), the members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting for the Company and are not experts in auditor independence standards or legal or regulatory matters. Members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and the independent auditors. Accordingly, the Audit
Committee'sCommittee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the AuditCommittee'sCommittee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of theCompany'sCompany’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that Ernst & Young LLP is in fact independent.Audit Committee of
The Board of Directors
R. Hartwell Gardner, Chairman
Linda K. Lawson, Member
Frank A. Risch, Member
Robert A. Solberg, Member
Jim A. Watson, Member
40CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The
Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, as amended and restated by the Board of Directors in November 2006, cover the following principal subjects:oRole and functions of the Board of Directors and its Lead Director
oQualifications and independence of directors
oSize of the Board of Directors and director selection process
oCommittee functions and independence of committee members
oMeetings of non-employee directors
oSelf-evaluation
o Ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current "Code of Business Conduct and Ethics" is posted on the Company's website at www.pxd.com) o
•
Ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” is posted on the Company’s website atwww.pxd.com)
Reporting of concerns to non-employee directors or the Audit Committee
oCompensation of the Board of Directors and stock ownership requirements
oSuccession planning and annual compensation review of senior management
oAccess to senior management and to independent advisors
oNew director orientation
oContinuing education
oRelated person transactions
The
"Corporate“Corporate GovernanceGuidelines"Guidelines” are posted on theCompany'sCompany’s website atwww.pxd.com/governance.governance. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed periodically and as necessary by theCompany'sCompany’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.
Director Independence
The
Company'sCompany’s standards for determining director independence require the assessment ofdirectors'directors’ independence each year. A director cannot be considered independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she does not have any relationship with management or the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, including any of the relationships that would disqualify the director from being independent under the rules of the NYSE. As contemplated by the NYSE rules, the Board of Directors has also adopted categorical standards to assist in determining whether any material relationship with the Company or its management exists. Directors who have any of the relationships outlined in the categorical standards are considered to have relationships that require the Board ofDirectors'Directors’ review of the full facts and circumstances in order to determine whether the relationship impairs the independence of the director. The categorical standards are as follows:1. the director has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company; 2. the director, or any member of the director's family, has not been employed by the Company in the last three years; 3. the director, or any member of the director's family, has not been employed by, or affiliated with, the Company's auditor in the last three years; 414. the director, or any member of the director's family, has not been part of an interlocking directorate in the last three years; 5. the director, or any member of the director's family, has not received non-director fee compensation from the Company in the last three years; 6. the director is not an executive officer or employee, and no member of the director's family is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or two percent of such other company's consolidated gross revenues in the last three years; 7. the director does not own more than 4.9 percent of the Company's shares; 8. the director does not serve on more than three other public company boards; and 9. the director does not serve on the board of another oil and gas exploration and production company.
1.
the director has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company;
2.
the director, or any member of the director’s family, has not been employed by the Company in the last three years;
3.
the director, or any member of the director’s family, has not been employed by, or affiliated with, the Company’s auditor in the last three years;
4.
the director, or any member of the director’s family, has not been part of an interlocking directorate in the last three years;
5.
the director, or any member of the director’s family, has not received non-director fee compensation from the Company in the last three years;
6.
the director is not an executive officer or employee, and no member of the director’s family is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or two percent of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues in the last three years;
7.
the director does not own more than 4.9 percent of the Company’s shares;
8.
the director does not serve on more than three other public company boards; and
9.
the director does not serve on the board of another oil and gas exploration and production company.
In May
2006,2007, the Board of Directors assessed the independence of each non-employee director under theCompany'sCompany’s guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The Board of Directors affirmatively determined that all ten non-employee directors (Dr. Baroffio, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Gardner, Mrs. Lawson, Mr. Lundquist, Mr. Ramsey, Mr. Risch, Mr. Sexton, Mr. Solberg and Mr. Watson) are independent.The Board of Directors reviewed the facts and circumstances of Mr.
Lundquist'sLundquist’s and Mr.Sexton'sSexton’s interests in theCompany'sCompany’s 2004 acquisition of Evergreen Resources, Inc.("Evergreen"(“Evergreen”), of which Mr. Lundquist was an independent director and Mr. Sexton was the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as Mr.Sexton'sSexton’s payments under his change in control agreement with Evergreen and his non-competition agreement with the Company. The Board of Directors concluded that Mr.Lundquist'sLundquist’s economic interest in the Evergreen transaction was limited to his holdings as a security holder and that his prior activities as an independent director of Evergreen would not impair his independence as a director of the Company. The Board of Directors similarly concluded that Mr. Sexton is an independent director because Mr. Sexton ceased to be an employee of Evergreen at the time of the merger, because his economic interest in that transaction existed as an employee and stockholder of Evergreen,(both of which ceased at the merger or upon settlement of the dispute relating to the amount of change in control payments due him because of the merger),and because the payment for hisnewnon-competition agreement and his continuation of health care and other insurance benefits for two years following the merger did not constitute payment for services to the Company since it was not contingent on continuing service.In connection with its assessment of the independence of each non-employee director, the Board of Directors also determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the additional independence standards of the NYSE and SEC applicable to members of the Audit Committee. Those standards require that the director not be an affiliate of the Company and that the director not receive from the Company, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees except for fees for services as a director.
Election of Lead Director
In May
2006,2007, the Board of Directors reelected Mr. Ramsey, a non-employee director, to serve as the Lead Director. In this capacity Mr. Ramsey provides, in conjunction with the Chairman, leadership and guidance to the Board of Directors. He also (i) serves as chairman of the regular executive sessions of the independent directors; (ii) in consultation with the Chairman and Secretary, establishes the agenda for each meeting of the Board of Directors, taking into account suggestions of other directors; and (iii) serves as the Board ofDirectors'Directors’ contact for direct employee and stockholder communications with the Board of Directors.Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts
In May
2006,2007, the Board of Directors evaluated the members of the Audit Committee for financial literacy and the attributes of a financial expert. The Board of Directors determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that three of the Audit Committee members (Mrs. Lawson and Messrs. Gardner and Risch) are Audit Committee financial experts as defined by the SEC.42Attendance at Annual Meetings
The Board of Directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. All of the directors attended the
20062007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May3, 2006.16, 2007.Procedure for Directly Contacting the Board of Directors and Whistleblower Policy
A means for interested parties to contact the Board of Directors (including the Lead Director) directly has been established and is published on the
Company'sCompany’s website atwww.pxd.com.www.pxd.com. Matters for which this contact may be used include allegations about actions of the Company or its directors, officers or employees involving (i) questionable accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; (ii) materially misleading statements or omissions in SEC reports, press releases, or other public statements or other forms of wire, mail or securities fraud or (iii) dishonest or unethical conduct, conflicts of interest, violations of theCompany'sCompany’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or violation of laws. All complaints and concerns will be received and processed by theCompany'sCompany’s CorporateSecretary'sSecretary’s Office. Complaints relating to theCompany'sCompany’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to the Audit Committee of theCompany'sCompany’s Board of Directors and other concerns will be referred to the Lead Director of theCompany'sCompany’s Board of Directors. Information may be submitted confidentially and anonymously, although the Company may be obligated by law to disclose the information or identity of the person providing the information in connection with government or private legal actions and in some other circumstances. TheCompany'sCompany’s policy is not to take any adverse action, and to not tolerate any retaliation against any person for asking questions or making good faith reports of possible violations of law,theCompany policy or the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.43SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of common stock as of March
22, 2007,19, 2008, by (i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each NEO of the Company and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group:
Number of
Percentage
Name of Person or Identity of Group
Shares
Of Class (a)
- ----------------------------------- ---------- ------------
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. (c)
................................ 23,458,400 19.0 Longleaf Partners Fund O. Mason Hawkins 6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 900 Memphis, Tennessee 3811923,846,057
20.0
Longleaf Partners Fund
O. Mason Hawkins
6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 900
Memphis, Tennessee 38119
Neuberger Berman, Inc. (d)
............................................. 6,157,021 5.0 Neuberger Berman, LLC Neuberger Berman Management, Inc. 605 Third Ave. New York, New York 10158-36986,521,234
5.5
Neuberger Berman, LLC
Neuberger Berman Management, Inc.
605 Third Ave.
New York, New York 10158-3698
Scott D. Sheffield (e) (f) (g) (i)
..................................... 768,433(j)730,951
(b)
Richard P. Dealy (e) (f) (g)
.......................................... 140,063(j)127,271
(b)
Mark S. Berg (f) (g) (j)
49,898
(b)
Chris J. Cheatwood (e) (f) (g) (i)
.................................... 127,506(j)108,534
(b)
Timothy L. Dove (e) (f) (g)
............................................ 234,164(j)232,547
(b)
Danny L. Kellum (f) (g)................................................ 76,408 (b)
James R. Baroffio (f) (h)
.............................................. 16,42218,072
(b)
Edison C. Buchanan (f)
................................................. 17,20420,143
(b)
R. Hartwell Gardner
(e)(f)............................................ 45,03743,217
(b)
Linda K. Lawson (f) (h) (i)
................................................ 10,23810,194
(b)
Andrew D. Lundquist (f)
................................................ 13,22414,874
(b)
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr. (f)
............................................. 25,969(h)25,519
(b)
Frank A. Risch (f)
..................................................... 6,0257,675
(b)
Mark S. Sexton (f) (i)
................................................. 114,464(k)97,985
(b)
Robert A. Solberg (f)
................................................. 16,44819,490
(b)
Jim A. Watson (f)
...................................................... 9,62511,275
(b)
All directors and executive officers as a group
(19(21 persons) (e) (f)... 1,882,389 1.5- -----------(j)1,869,190
1.6
___________
(a)
Based on
123,386,066119,477,243 shares of common stock outstanding.
(b)
Does not exceed one percent of class.
(c)
The Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February
12, 2007,13, 2008, which is a joint statement on Schedule 13G/A filed by Southeastern Asset Management, Inc.("Southeastern"(“Southeastern”), Longleaf Partners Fund and O. Mason Hawkins("Hawkins"(“Hawkins”), states that the statement is being filed by Southeastern as a registered investment adviser, and that all of the securities covered by the statement are owned legally bySoutheastern'sSoutheastern’s investment advisory clients and none are owned directly or indirectly by Southeastern. The Schedule 13G/A further states that the statement is also being filed by Hawkins, the Chairman of the Boardof Directorsand CEO of Southeastern, in the event he could be deemed to be a controlling person of that firm as the result of his official positions with or ownership of its voting securities. The existence of such control is expressly disclaimed. Hawkins does not own directly or indirectly any securities covered by the Schedule 13G/A for his own account.44
(d)
The Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February
13, 2007,12, 2008, which is a joint statement on Schedule 13G/A filed by Neuberger Berman, Inc.,and Neuberger Berman LLC, and Neuberger Berman Management, Inc., states that Neuberger Berman, LLC and Neuberger Berman Management, Inc. are deemed to be beneficial owners since they both have shared power to make decisions whether to retain or dispose and vote the securities that are actually owned by clients of Neuberger Berman, LLC. Neuberger Berman, Inc. owns 100 percent of both Neuberger Berman LLC and Neuberger Berman Management, Inc. and does not own over one percent of the Company.
(e)
Includes the following number of shares subject to exercisable stock
options :options: Mr. Sheffield,332,000;256,000; Mr. Dealy,76,248;54,581; Mr. Cheatwood,77,666;54,332; Mr. Dove,107,666; and Mr. Gardner, 5,017;90,999; and all directors and executive officers as a group,704,513.535,243.
(f)
Includes the following number of unvested restricted shares or restricted stock units: Mr. Sheffield,
158,997;134,476; Mr. Dealy,38,182;36,825; Mr. Berg, 44,686; Mr. Cheatwood,34,166;28,686; Mr. Dove,63,265;60,703; Mr.Kellum, 34,166; Dr.Baroffio,1,871;1,650; Mr. Buchanan,6,306;2,939; Mr. Gardner,6,929;3,197; Mrs. Lawson,1,871;1,650; Mr. Lundquist,4,779;1,650; Mr. Ramsey,3,625;1,650; Mr. Risch,3,907;1,650; Mr. Sexton,1,871;1,650; Mr. Solberg,2,266;1,998; Mr. Watson,3,126;1,650; and all directors and executive officers as a group,474,325.454,413.
(g)
Includes the following number of shares held in each respective
officer'sofficer’s 401(k) account: Mr. Sheffield,10,412;10,448; Mr. Dealy,305;306; Mr. Berg, 5,212; Mr. Cheatwood,510;127; and Mr. Dove,345; and Mr. Kellum, 522.346.
(h)
Includes
11,053the following number of shares held intrust that are shares beneficially owned bytrusts for the benefit of family members: Dr.Baroffio. (i)Baroffio, 11,053; Mrs. Lawson, 6,844; Mr.Sheffield'sRamsey, 16,869.
(i)
Mr. Sheffield’s beneficial ownership includes 7,327 shares held in
Mr. Sheffield'shis investment retirement account. Mr.Cheatwood'sCheatwood’s beneficial ownership includes3,0004,500 shares held in custodial accounts in the names of his minor children. Mrs.Lawson'sLawson’s beneficial ownership includes 1,700 shares held inMrs. Lawson'sinvestment retirementaccounts.accounts in her name. Mr.Sexton'sSexton’s beneficial ownership includes 4,165 shares held inMr. Sexton'shis investment retirement account.
(j)
Excludes the performance units that will vest if and to the extent predetermined performance targets are achieved assuming that the “Threshold” performance targets are achieved.
(k)
Mr. Sexton’s beneficial ownership includes 50,000 shares that have been pledged as collateral for a personal loan.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The executive officers and directors of the Company are required to file reports with the SEC, disclosing the amount and nature of their beneficial ownership in common stock, as well as changes in that ownership.
Based solely on its review of reports and written representations that the Company has received, the Company is aware that Chris J. Cheatwood, the
Company'sCompany’s Executive Vice President,Worldwide Exploration,Geoscience, did not timely file one report on Form54 covering agift transactionredistribution in his 401(k) account effected during2005, and Robert A. Solberg,2007; Linda K. Lawson, one of theCompany'sCompany’s directors, did not timely file a Form 5 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 covering five estate planning transactions that actually occurred in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006; and Charles E. Ramsey, Jr., another of the Company’s directors, did not timely file one report on Form 4 covering the vestingduring 2006ofa previously reportedrestricted stockunit award.units during 2007, and one report on Form 5 covering two gift transactions effected during 2007. The Company believes that all other required reports were timely filed during2006.2007.TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Benefit Arrangement for Mr. Sexton. In 2004, the Company acquired Evergreen in a merger. Before the completion of the merger, Mark S. Sexton was Evergreen's Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of Mr. Sexton's change in control agreement with Evergreen, the Company provided Mr. Sexton continuation of his health care and other insurance benefits from the date of the merger through September 2006, although from the beginning of 2006, Mr. Sexton obtained health care insurance from his current employer and did not file claims under the Company-provided coverage.Employment of Tom Sheffield.Tom Sheffield, the brother of Scott D. Sheffield, is employed at a subsidiary of the Company as the
RatonVice President of the Rockies AssetTeam Manager.Team. For2006,2007, Tom Sheffield was paid$149,966$170,000 in base salary and$43,323$68,000 in bonus and received restricted stock awards for1,1541,470 shares of Company common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant of$50,303.$63,004. Scott D. Sheffield disclaims any interest in TomSheffield'sSheffield’s compensation.Bryan Sheffield and Well Operations Transaction.The Company has been informed that Bryan Sheffield, the son of Scott D. Sheffield, plans to enter into a contract with a third party under which he (or a company he controls) will operate certain Spraberry field wells in which the Company holds an average
29.7428 percent working interest. The total expected annual overhead and supervision fees paid for operating these wells is approximately$681,552$722,634 (with theCompany'sCompany’s expected net share being$248,610)$266,120), based on20062007 actual billings. The Company determined that it is in its interest for the operator of these wells to be properly trained. For this reason, in January 2007 Bryan Sheffield was employed at a subsidiary of the Company asan Operations Tech to supplement
45his training in the Spraberry area. Under this employment arrangement, Bryan Sheffield'sSheffield’s total annual compensationiswas less than $60,000.The Company expects thatAs of April 3, 2008, the date BryanSheffield'sSheffield terminated his employmentwill terminate beforewith the Company’s subsidiary, heassumeshad not assumed the operations of these Spraberry wells. Scott D. Sheffield disclaims any interest in any compensation paid to Bryan Sheffield from the Company or from the future operation of these wells.Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Person Transactions
The
Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will periodically review all related person transactions that the rules of the SEC require be disclosed in theCompany'sCompany’s Proxy Statement, and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding the initial authorization or ratification of any such transaction. In the event that the Board of Directors considers ratification of a related person transaction and determines not to so ratify, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that management will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul the transaction. In February2007,2008, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducted its annual review of all such related person transactions.The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in determining whether or not to recommend the initial approval or ratification of a related person transaction, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available, including (if applicable) but not limited to: (i) whether there is an appropriate business justification for the transaction; (ii) the benefits that accrue to the Company as a result of the transaction; (iii) the terms available to unrelated third parties entering into similar transactions; (iv) the impact of the transaction on a
director'sdirector’s independence (in the event the related person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer); (v) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (vi) whether it is a single transaction or a series of ongoing, related transactions; and (vii) whether entering into the transaction would be consistent with theCompany'sCompany’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.There were no transactions since the beginning of
20062007 that were required to be reported in"Transactions“Transactions with RelatedPersons"Persons” where the procedures described above did not require review, approval or ratification or where these procedures were not followed.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES
Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal for action at the
20082009 annual meeting of stockholders and wishes to have such proposal (a"Rule“Rule 14a-8Proposal"Proposal”) included in theCompany'sCompany’s proxy materials, must submit such Rule 14a-8 Proposal to the Company at its principal executive offices no later than December6, 2007,5, 2008, unless the Company notifies the stockholders otherwise. Only those Rule 14a-8 Proposals that are timely received by the Company and proper for stockholder action (and otherwise proper) will be included in theCompany'sCompany’s proxy materials.Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal for action at the
20082009 annual meeting of stockholders, but does not wish to have such proposal (a"Non-Rule“Non-Rule 14a-8Proposal"Proposal”) included in theCompany'sCompany’s proxy materials, must submit such Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal to the Company at its principal executive offices so that it is received no later than February19, 2008,18, 2009, unless the Company notifies the stockholders otherwise. If a Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal is not received by the Company on or before February19, 2008,18, 2009, then the Company intends to exercise its discretionary voting authority with respect to such Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal."Discretionary“Discretionary voting
authority"authority” is the ability to vote proxies that stockholders have executed andreturnedsubmitted to the Company, on matters not specifically reflected in theCompany'sCompany’s proxy materials, and on which stockholders have not had an opportunity to vote by proxy.It is the responsibility of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify, evaluate and recommend to the Board the Directors nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as
for
46filling vacancies or additions on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee endeavors to recommend only director candidates who possess the highest personal values and integrity; who have experience and have exhibited achievements in one or more of the key professional, business, financial, legal and other challenges that face a large global U.S. independent oil and gas company; who exhibit sound judgment, intelligence, personal character, and the ability to make independent analytical inquiries; who demonstrate a willingness to devote adequate time to Board of Director duties; and who are likely to be able to serve on the Board of Directors for a sustained period. Consideration will also be given to the Board of Directors'Directors’ overall balance of diversity of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences.In identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee relies on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and officers. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from time to time will engage a third party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider any nominee recommended by stockholders for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in
20082009 if that nomination is submitted in writing, not later than December6, 2007,5, 2008, to the Secretary, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 NorthO'ConnorO’Connor Boulevard, Suite 200, Irving, Texas 75039. With respect to each such nominee, the following information must be provided to the Company with the written nomination:a) the nominee's name, address and other personal information; b) the number of shares of each class and series of stock of the Company held by such nominee; c) the nominating stockholder's name, residential address and telephone number, business address and telephone number; and d) all other information required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
a)
the nominee’s name, address and other personal information;
b)
the number of shares of each class and series of stock of the Company held by such nominee;
c)
the nominating stockholder’s name, residential address and telephone number, business address and telephone number; and
d)
all other information required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Each submission must also include a statement of the qualifications of the nominee, a notarized consent signed by the nominee evidencing a willingness to serve as a director, if elected, and a commitment by the nominee to meet personally with members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors.
Stockholders desiring to propose action at the annual meeting of stockholders must also comply with Article Nine of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. Under Article Nine, a stockholder must submit to the Company, no later than 60 days before the annual meeting or ten days after the first public notice of the annual meeting is sent to stockholders, a written notice setting forth (i) the nature of the proposal with particularity, including the written text of the proposal, (ii) the
stockholder'sstockholder’s name, address and other personal information, (iii) any interest of the stockholder in the proposed business, (iv) the name of any persons nominated to be elected or reelected as a director by the stockholder and (v) with respect to each such nominee, thenominee'snominee’s name, address and other personal information, the number of shares of each class and series of stock of the Company held by such nominee, all information required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and a notarized letter containing suchnominee'snominee’s acceptance of the nomination, stating his or her intention to serve as a director, if elected, and consenting to be named as a nominee in any proxy statement relating to such election. The person presiding at the annual meeting will determine whether business is properly brought before the meeting and will not permit the consideration of any business not properly brought before the meeting.47Written requests for inclusion of any stockholder proposal should be addressed to Secretary, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North
O'ConnorO’Connor Boulevard, Suite 200, Irving, Texas 75039. The Company suggests that any such proposal be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
Solicitation of Proxies may be made via the Internet, by mail, personal interview or telephone by officers, directors and regular employees of the Company. The Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the common stock that those companies or persons hold of record, and the Company will reimburse the forwarding expenses. In addition, the Company has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in solicitation for a fee estimated not to exceed $9,000. The Company will bear all costs of solicitation.
STOCKHOLDER LIST
In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company will maintain at its corporate offices in Irving, Texas, a list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The list will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for purposes germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours for ten days before the Annual Meeting.
ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER INFORMATION
The
Company'sCompany’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31,2006,2007, is beingmailedmade available to stockholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement and does not form part of the proxy solicitation material.A copy of the
Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006,2007, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder without charge upon writtenrequest addressed to Investor Relations, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 200, Irving, Texas 75039.request. A copy of this Proxy Statement or our Annual Report on Form 10-K will also be sent upon written or oral request to any stockholder of a shared address to which a single copy of this Proxy Statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K was delivered.RequestsSuch requests may be made by writing to Investor Relations, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 NorthO'ConnorO’Connor Boulevard, Suite 200, Irving, Texas 75039 or by calling 972-969-3583. The Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available at theSEC'sSEC’s website in its EDGAR database atwww.sec.gov.www.sec.gov .Stockholders may request copies of the
Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any charter for a committee of the Board of Directors by writing to Investor Relations at the address set forth in the previous paragraph.48INTERNET AND PHONE VOTING
For shares of stock that are registered in your name, you
have the opportunity tomay vote by internet or phone using procedures provided by theCompany'sCompany’s transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company("Continental"(“Continental”). Votes submitted by internet or phone must be received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, onTuesday,Thursday, May 15,2007.2008. The giving of such a proxy will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.To vote by internet or phone, please follow the instructions on your proxy card.The internet and phone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholder identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that
stockholders'stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders voting by internet should remember that the stockholder must bear costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies.For shares of stock that are registered in a street name (the stockholder owns shares in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record on the books of the
Company'sCompany’s transfer agent), you will receive instructions with your proxy materials that you must follow in order to have your shares voted. Please review your Proxy or voting instruction card to determine whether you can vote by phone or electronically.********
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE BY INTERNET, BY PHONE OR IF YOU HAVE REQUESTED PAPER COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIAL, BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID, ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.
By Order of the Board of Directors, /s/ Mark H. Kleinman -------------------- Mark H. Kleinman Secretary
By Order of the Board of Directors.
/s/ Mark H. Kleinman
Mark H. Kleinman
Secretary
Irving, Texas
April 4,
2007 492008 VOTE BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE
QUICK***EASY***IMMEDIATE
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PROXY SOLICITED FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 16,
20072008TO VOTE BY INTERNET
www.continentalstock.com
Have this proxy card in hand when you access the above website. At
"ContinentaLink"“ContinentaLink” on the right side, select"Proxy“Proxy Voting Log In."” Follow the instructions on the screen to vote your shares.TO VOTE BY PHONE
Call toll-free (in the U.S.) 1-866-894-0537.
Have this proxy card in hand when you call, and follow the instructions.
Your internet or phone vote works in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card by mail. Internet and phone votes must be received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 15,
2007.2008.If you vote by internet or phone, please do not return the card below.
TO VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date the proxy card below, detach it and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROXY BY MAIL
Please mark your votes like this [X]
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED
"FOR"“FOR” THE PROPOSALS. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. TO BE VALID, THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
"FOR"“FOR” ITEMS 12AND3. ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS [ ] FOR ALL [ ] WITHHELD FOR ALL2.
ITEM 1- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
o
FOR ALL
o
WITHHELD FOR ALL
Nominees:
01 R. Hartwell Gardner 03 Frank A. Risch 02 Linda K. Lawson 04 Mark S. Sexton
01
James R. Baroffio
03
Scott D. Sheffield
02
Edison C. Buchanan
04
Jim A. Watson
WITHHELD FOR: (List below each nominee for whom you do not wish to vote.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ITEM 2- RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN ITEM 3 - APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN [ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
o
FOR
o
AGAINST
o
ABSTAIN
IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES MAY VOTE ON ANY OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT(S) THEREOF.
IF YOU WISH TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE, PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.
Signature
_____________________________________________ Signature_________________________________________________ Date ________Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation or partnership, sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer and give title.
Access to Pioneer stockholder account information and other stockholder services are available on the internet!
Visit Continental Stock
Transfer'sTransfer’s website atwww.continentalstock.com
for their Internet Stockholder Service - ContinentaLink
Through this service, shareholders can change addresses, receive electronic forms and view account transaction history and dividend history.
To access this service, visit the website listed above. At
"ContinentaLink"“ContinentaLink” on the right side of the home page, select"Shareholder“Shareholder Log In."” From there, you can either"View“View a SampleAccount"Account” or you can register (choose"First“First TimeVisitor"Visitor” then"New“New MemberSign-Up"Sign-Up”). Guidance is provided on the website.FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
The undersigned hereby appoints Richard P. Dealy and Mark S. Berg, and each of them, as attorneys in fact and proxies for the undersigned with full power of substitution and revocation as to each of them, to represent the undersigned and to vote all the shares of common stock of Pioneer Natural Resources Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16,
2007,2008, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon the matters set forth on the reverse side.(Continued,(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
VOTE BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE
QUICK***EASY***IMMEDIATE
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PROXY SOLICITED FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 16,
20072008TO VOTE BY INTERNET
www.continentalstock.com
Have this proxy card in hand when you access the above website. At
"ContinentaLink"“ContinentaLink” on the right side, select"Proxy“Proxy Voting Log In."” Follow the instructions on the screen to vote your shares.TO VOTE BY PHONE
Call toll-free (in the U.S.) 1-866-894-0537.
Have this proxy card in hand when you call, and follow the instructions.
Your internet or phone vote works in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card by mail.
If you vote by internet or phone, please do not return the card below.
TO VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date the proxy card below, detach it and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROXY BY MAIL
Please mark your votes like this [X]
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. TO BE VALID, THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
"FOR"“FOR” ITEMS1, 2 AND 3. ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS [ ] FOR ALL [ ] WITHHELD FOR ALL1AND 2.
ITEM 1- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
o
FOR ALL
o
WITHHELD FOR ALL
Nominees:
01 R. Hartwell Gardner 03 Frank A. Risch 02 Linda K. Lawson 04 Mark S. Sexton
01
James R. Baroffio
03
Scott D. Sheffield
02 Edison C. Buchanan
04
Jim A. Watson
WITHHELD FOR: (List below each nominee for whom you do not wish to vote.)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------ITEM 2- RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN ITEM 3 - APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN [ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
o
FOR
o
AGAINST
o
ABSTAIN
IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES MAY VOTE ON ANY OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT(S) THEREOF.
IF YOU WISH TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE, PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.
Signature
_____________________________________________ Signature_________________________________________________ Date ________Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation or partnership, sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer and give title.
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on May 16,
2007.2008. Your voting instruction must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, on May11, 200713, 2008 to allow Vanguard to vote according to your instruction.FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROXY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 401(k) PLAN
TO: THE VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE FOR THE EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBUTION (STOCK ACCOUNT) OF THE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 401(k) AND MATCHING PLAN
In connection with the proxy materials I received relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Pioneer Natural Resources Company to be held on May 16,
2007,2008, I direct you to execute a proxy with respect to all shares of common stock of Pioneer to which I have the right to give voting instructions under the 401(k) plan upon the matters set forth on the reverse side. I understand you will hold these instructions strictly confidential.(Continued,(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
APPENDIX A PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (Amended and Restated Effective as of September 1, 2007)PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (Amended and Restated Effective as of September 1, 2007) This Amended and Restated PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (this "Plan") is made and executed by Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"). W I T N E S S E T H T H A T: WHEREAS the Pioneer Natural Resources Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan was Adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board') and approved by the stockholders of the Company on August 7, 1997; WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan on December 9, 2005 to incorporate prior amendments and make certain other changes; WHEREAS, the Company now desires to again amend and restate the Plan to extend the term of the Plan and to make certain other changes; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to the authority reserved thereunder, the Pioneer Natural Resources Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety, effective as of September 1, 2007, to read as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide eligible employees with an incentive to advance the interests of the Company by affording an opportunity to purchase stock of the Company at a favorable price. 2. Administration Of The Plan. The Plan shall be administered by a committee of, and appointed by, the Board (the "Committee"). Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall interpret and construe the Plan and all options granted under the Plan; shall make such rules as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan; shall make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, including the determination of eligibility to participate in the Plan and the amount of a Participant's (as defined in subparagraph 6(b)) option under the Plan; and shall correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any option granted under the Plan in the manner and to the extent that the Committee deems desirable to carry the Plan or any option into effect. The Committee shall, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, make such decisions or determinations and take such actions as it deems appropriate; and all such decisions, determinations and actions taken or made by the Committee pursuant to this and the other paragraphs of the Plan shall be conclusive on all parties. The Committee shall not be liable for any decision, determination or action taken in good faith in connection with the administration of the Plan. 3. Participating Companies. Each present and future parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company (within the meaning of Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code")) that is eligible by law to participate in the Plan shall be a "Participating Company" during the period that such corporation is such a parent or subsidiary corporation; provided, however, that the Committee may at any time and from time to time, in its sole discretion, terminate a Participating Company's Plan participation; provided, further however, that any foreign parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan only upon approval of the Board or the Committee. Any Participating Company may, by appropriate action of its board of directors, terminate its participation in the Plan. Transfer of employment among the Company and Participating Companies (and among any other parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company) shall not be considered a termination of employment hereunder.4. Eligibility. All employees, other than officers, of the Company and the Participating Companies who have been employed by the Company or any Participating Company (including any predecessor company) for at least six (6) months (including any authorized leave of absence meeting the requirements of Treasury Regulation ss. 1.421-7(h)(2)) as of the applicable date of grant (defined below) and who are customarily employed at least 20 hours per week and at least five (5) months per year shall be eligible to participate in the Plan; provided, however, that no option shall be granted to an employee if such employee, immediately after the option is granted, owns stock possessing five percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of its parent or subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of Sections 423(b)(3) and 424(d) of the Code) ("Eligible Employee"). 5. Stock Subject To the Plan. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 12 (relating to adjustment upon changes in stock), the aggregate number of shares of the authorized common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the "Stock") which may be sold pursuant to options granted under the Plan shall not exceed the original number of shares authorized under the Plan (750,000) less the total number of shares sold under the Plan from the adoption of the Plan through the effective date of this amendment and restatement of the Plan. Such shares may be unissued shares, reacquired shares, or shares bought on the market for purposes of the Plan. Should any option granted under the Plan expire or terminate prior to its exercise in full, the shares theretofore subject to such option may again be subject to an option granted under the Plan. Any shares which are not subject to outstanding options upon the termination of the Plan shall cease to be subject to the Plan. 6. Grant of Options. (a) General Statement; "Date of Grant;" "Option Period;" "Date Of Exercise." Upon the effective date of the Plan and continuing while the Plan remains in force, the Company shall offer options under the Plan to all Eligible Employees to purchase shares of Stock. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, these options shall be granted on January 1, 2008, and, thereafter, on the first day of January of each subsequent year (each of which dates is herein referred to as a "date of grant"). The term of each option granted shall be for a period of eight (8) months beginning on date of grant and ending on August 31 (each such 8-month period is herein referred to as an "option period"). The last day of each option period is herein referred to as a "date of exercise." The number of shares subject to each option shall be the quotient of the sum of the payroll deductions withheld on behalf of each Participant in accordance with subparagraph 6(b), the payments made by such Participant pursuant to subparagraph 6(f) during the option period and any amount carried forward from the preceding option period pursuant to subparagraph 7(a), divided by the "option price" (defined in subparagraph 7(b) of the Stock, excluding all fractions; provided, however, that the maximum number of shares that may be subject to any option may not exceed one thousand (1000) (subject to adjustment as provided in paragraph 12). (b) Election to Participate; Payroll Deduction Authorization. Except as provided in subparagraph 6(f), an Eligible Employee may participate in the Plan only by means of payroll deduction. Except as provided in subparagraph 6(g), each Eligible Employee who elects to participate in the Plan (each such participating Eligible Employee being a "Participant") shall deliver to the Company, within the time period prescribed by the Committee, a written payroll deduction authorization on a form prepared by the Committee whereby he gives notice of his election to participate in the Plan as of the next following date of grant, and whereby he designates an integral percentage or specific amount of his "eligible compensation" (as defined in subparagraph 6(d)) to be deducted from his compensation for each pay period and credited to a book entry account established in his name. The designated percentage or specific amount may not result in a deduction during any payroll period of an amount less than $20.00. The designated percentage or specific amount may not exceed either of the following: (i) 15% of the amount of eligible compensation from which the deduction is made; or (ii) an amount which will result in noncompliance with the $25,000 limitation stated in subparagraph 6(e). (c) Changes in Payroll Authorization. Except as provided in subparagraph 8(a), the payroll deduction authorization referred to in subparagraph 6(b) may not be changed during the option period.(d) "Eligible Compensation" Defined. The term "eligible compensation" means the gross (before taxes are withheld) total of all wages, salaries, commissions and bonuses received during the option period, except that such term shall include elective contributions made on an employee's behalf by the Company or a Participating Company that are not includable in income under Section 125 or Section 402(e)(3) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, "eligible compensation" shall not include (i) employer contributions to or payments from any deferred compensation program, whether such program is qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code (other than amounts considered as employer contributions under Section 402(e)(3) of the Code) or nonqualified, (ii) amounts realized from the receipt or exercise of a stock option that is not an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, (iii) amounts realized at the time property described in Section 83 of the Code is freely transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, (iv) amounts realized as a result of an election described in Section 83(b) of the Code, and (v) any amount realized as a result of a disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 421(a) of the Code. (e) $25,000 Limitation. No Eligible Employee shall be granted an option under the Plan to the extent such grant would permit him to purchase Stock under the Plan and under all other employee stock purchase plans of the Company and its parent and subsidiary corporations (as such terms are defined in Section 424(e) and (f) of the Code) to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 of the Fair Market Value of Stock (determined at the time the option is granted) for each calendar year in which any such option granted to such employee is outstanding at any time (within the meaning of Section 423(b)(8) of the Code). (f) Leaves of Absence. During a paid leave of absence approved by the Company and meeting the requirements of Treasury Regulation ss. 1.421-7(h)(2), a Participant's elected payroll deductions shall continue. If a Participant takes an unpaid leave of absence that is approved by the Company or a Participating Company and meets the requirements of Treasury Regulation ss. 1.421-7(h)(2), then such Participant may continue participation in the Plan by cash payments to the Company on his normal pay days equal to the reduction in his payroll deductions caused by his leave. If a Participant on such leave fails to make such payments, or if a Participant takes a leave of absence that is not described in the preceding provisions of this subparagraph 6(f), then the Committee shall determine whether the Participant shall be considered to have withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 hereof or whether the Participant's payroll deductions shall remain subject to the Plan and used to exercise options on the next following date of exercise. (g) Continuing Election. Unless a Participant is notified to the contrary, a Participant (i) who has elected to participate in the Plan pursuant to subparagraph 6(b) as of a date of grant and (ii) who takes no action to change or revoke such election as of the next following date of grant and/or as of any subsequent date of grant prior to any such respective date of grant, shall be deemed to have made the same election, including the same attendant payroll deduction authorization, for such next following and/or subsequent date(s) of grant as was in effect for the date of grant for which he made such election to participate. A Participant who wants to discontinue participation in the Plan for a subsequent option period shall deliver to the Company a notice of withdrawal pursuant to paragraph 8, at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of the option period. 7. Exercise of Options. (a) General Statement. Each Eligible Employee who is a Participant in the Plan, automatically and without any act on his part, shall be deemed to have exercised his option on each date of exercise to the extent that the cash balance then in his account under the Plan is sufficient to purchase at the "option price" (as defined in subparagraph 7(b)) whole shares of Stock. Any balance remaining in his account after payment of the purchase price of those whole shares may, at the discretion of the Company, either be refunded to him as soon as practicable after each date of exercise, or carried forward and used towards the purchase of whole shares in the next following option period. (b) "Option Price" Defined. The option price per share of Stock to be paid by each Eligible Employee on each exercise of his option shall be an amount equal to the lesser of 85% of the Fair Market Value of theStock on the date of exercise or on the date of grant. For all purposes under the Plan, the "Fair Market Value" of a share of Stock means, for a particular day: (i) If shares of Stock of the same class are listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges on any national or regional securities exchange at the date of determining the Fair Market Value, then the last reported sale price, regular way, on the composite tape of that exchange on that business day or, if no such sale takes place on that business day, the average of the closing bid and asked prices, regular way, in either case as reported in the principal consolidated transaction reporting system with respect to securities listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges on that securities exchange or, if no such closing prices are available for that day, the last reported sale price, regular way, on the composite tape of that exchange on the last business day before the date in question; or (ii) If shares of Stock of the same class are not listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges as provided in subparagraph (i) and if sales prices for shares of Stock of the same class in the over-the-counter market are reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotations, Inc. ("NASDAQ") National Market System (or a similar system then in use) at the date of determining the Fair Market Value, then the last reported sales price so reported on that business day or, if no such sale takes place on that business day, the average of the high bid and low asked prices so reported or, if no such prices are available for that day, the last reported sale price so reported on the last business day before the date in question; or (iii) If shares of Stock of the same class are not listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges as provided in subparagraph (i) and sales prices for shares of Stock of the same class are not reported by the NASDAQ National Market System (or a similar system then in use) as provided in subparagraph (ii), and if bid and asked prices for shares of Stock of the same class in the over-the-counter market are reported by NASDAQ (or, if not so reported, by the National Quotation Bureau Incorporated) at the date of determining the Fair Market Value, then the average of the high bid and low asked prices on that business day or, if no such prices are available for that day, the average of the high bid and low asked prices on the last business day before the date in question; or (iv) If shares of Stock of the same class are not listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges as provided in subparagraph (i) and sales prices or bid and asked prices therefor are not reported by NASDAQ (or the National Quotation Bureau Incorporated) as provided in subparagraph (ii) or subparagraph (iii) at the date of determining the Fair Market Value, then the value determined in good faith by the Committee, which determination shall be conclusive for all purposes; or (v) If shares of Stock of the same class are listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges as provided in subparagraph (i) or sales prices or bid and asked prices therefor are reported by NASDAQ (or the National Quotation Bureau Incorporated) as provided in subparagraph (ii) or subparagraph (iii) at the date of determining the Fair Market Value, but the volume of trading is so low that the Board of Directors determines in good faith that such prices are not indicative of the fair value of the Stock, then the value determined in good faith by the Committee, which determination shall be conclusive for all purposes notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (i), (ii) or (iii). (c) Delivery of Stock. As soon as practicable after each date of exercise, the Company shall deposit into each Participant's brokerage account maintained for the purposes of holding Stock under this Plan and other employee benefit plans of the Company, the number of whole shares of Stock purchased by such Participant upon exercise of his or her options granted hereunder. Except as provided in the immediately following sentence, shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of options granted hereunder shall be uncertificated and evidenced by book entry into the brokerage accounts described above. Upon written request made by any Participant to the Company, the Company shall arrange, as soon as practicable after receipt of any such request, to deliver to suchParticipant a certificate representing any or all such uncertificated shares of Stock. In the event the Company is required to obtain from any commission or agency authority to issue any shares of Stock hereunder, the Company shall seek to obtain such authority. Inability of the Company to obtain from any such commission or agency authority which counsel for the Company deems necessary for the lawful issuance of any shares of Stock shall relieve the Company from liability to any Participant in the Plan except to return to the Participant the amount of the balance in the Participant's account. The Company may cause any Stock certificates issued in connection with the exercise of options under the Plan to bear such legend or legends, and the Company may take such other actions, as it deems appropriate in order to reflect the provisions of this subparagraph 7(c) and to assure compliance with applicable securities laws. Neither the Company nor the Committee shall have any liability with respect to a delay in the delivery of Stock or a certificate pursuant to this subparagraph 7(c). 8. Withdrawal from the Plan. (a) General Statement. Any Participant may withdraw in whole from the Plan at any time prior to 30 days before the exercise date relating to a particular option period. Partial withdrawals shall not be permitted. A Participant who wishes to withdraw from the Plan must timely deliver to the Company a notice of withdrawal on a form prepared by the Committee. The Company, promptly following the time when the notice of withdrawal is delivered, shall refund to the Participant the amount of the cash balance in his account under the Plan; and thereupon, automatically and without any further act on his part, his payroll deduction authorization and his interest in unexercised options under the Plan shall terminate. (b) Eligibility Following Withdrawal. A Participant who withdraws from the Plan shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan during the then current option period (if any), but shall be eligible to participate again in the Plan in a subsequent option period (provided that he is otherwise an Eligible Employee at such time). 9. Termination of Employment. If the employment of a Participant terminates for any reason whatsoever, his participation in the Plan automatically and without any act on his part shall terminate as of the date of the termination of his employment. The Company shall refund to him the amount of the cash balance in his account under the Plan, and thereupon his interest in unexercised options under the Plan shall terminate. 10. Restriction Upon Assignment of Option. An option granted under the Plan shall not be pledged, assigned or transferred otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Each option shall be exercisable, only by the Participant to whom granted during such Participant's lifetime. The Company shall not recognize and shall be under no duty to recognize any assignment or purported assignment by a Participant of his option or of any rights under his option, and any such attempt may be treated by the Company as an election to withdraw from the Plan the notice for which has been delivered to the Company. 11. No Rights of Stockholder Until Stock Issued. With respect to shares of Stock subject to an option, a Participant shall not be deemed to be a stockholder, and he shall not have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder, until, (a) shares of Stock are deposited into his brokerage account, as described in subparagraph 7(c) hereof, or (b) a certificate for shares of Stock is issued on his behalf, whichever occurs first." 12. Adjustments Upon Changes in Stock. (a) Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization. In the event of any change in the number or kind of outstanding shares of Stock subject to options hereunder effected without receipt of consideration therefor by the Company, by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, combination, exchange of shares or other recapitalization, merger, or otherwise, in which the Company is the surviving corporation, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment shall be made in the number or kind of shares as to which options are or may be granted hereunder. A corresponding adjustment changing the number or kind of shares allocated to unexercised options or portions thereof, which shall havebeen granted prior to any such change, shall likewise be made. Any such adjustment, however, in the outstanding options shall be made without change in the total price applicable to the unexercised portion of the option but with a corresponding adjustment, if appropriate, in the price for each share of Stock covered by the option. In the event of a dispute concerning such adjustment, the decision of the Committee shall be conclusive. The number of shares subject to any option granted hereunder shall be automatically reduced by any fraction included therein which results from any adjustment made pursuant to this Section 12(a). (b) Adjustments Upon Change of Control. Further, in the event of a Change of Control (as defined below) of the Company, the Committee shall, at its option,(i) substitute for the shares of the Company subject to the unexercised portions of such outstanding options an appropriate number of shares of each class of stock or other securities of the reorganized or merged or consolidated corporation which were distributed to the stockholders of the Company with respect to the same class of shares of the Company (or, as appropriate, in the case of an acquisition of the Company by another corporation, substitute the shares of the acquiring corporation for the shares of the Company); or (ii) cancel all such options as of the effective date of any such transaction by giving notice to each holder thereof or his personal representative of its intention to do so and by permitting the holders thereof to exercise of all such outstanding options, without regard to any other provisions of the Plan, during the 30-day period immediately preceding such effective date; or (iii) allow the options granted under the Plan to remain outstanding without any modifications or amendments. (c) Change of Control Defined. For purposes of subparagraph 12(b) of the Plan, a "Change of Control" means an event that constitutes a "change in control" as defined in the Company's 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as subsequently amended from time to time; or if any successor or subsequent equity incentive plan is adopted by the Company, "Change in Control" means an event that constitutes a "change in control" under such successor or subsequent plan, as amended from time to time; provided, however, that any amendment to such definition or definition in a successor or subsequent plan shall not be applied in determining the definition of Change in Control under this Plan, with respect to any rights applicable to the option period during which the revision to the definition occurs, unless such amended or alternate definition operates at least as favorably to the affected Participant in all relevant respects as the definition of Change in Control prior to such amendment. 13. Use of Funds; No Interest Paid. All funds received or held by the Company under the Plan shall be included in the general funds of the Company free of any trust or other restriction, and may be used for any corporate purpose. No interest shall be paid to any Participant or credited to his account under the Plan. 14. Term of the Plan. This amended and restated version of the Plan shall be effective as of September 1, 2007. If not sooner terminated under the provisions of paragraph 15, the Plan shall terminate upon and no further options shall be granted after December 31, 2017. 15. Amendment or Termination of the Plan. The Board in its discretion may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which options have not theretofore been granted. The Board shall have the right to alter or amend the Plan or any part thereof from time to time; provided, that no change in any option theretofore granted may be made which would impair the rights of the Participant without the consent of such Participant; and provided, further, that the Board may not make any alteration or amendment which would increase the aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to the provisions of the Plan (other than as a result of the anti-dilution provisions of the Plan), change the class of individuals eligible to receive options under the Plan, extend the term of the Plan, cause options issued under the Plan to fail to meet the requirements for employee stock purchase plans as defined in Section 423 of the Code, or otherwise modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan without the approval of the stockholders of the Company. 16. Securities Laws. The Company shall not be obligated to issue any Stock pursuant to any option granted under the Plan at any time when the shares covered by such option have not been registered under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, and such other state and federal laws, rules or regulations as the Company or the Committee deems applicable and, in the opinion of legal counsel for the Company, there is no exemption from the registration requirements of such laws, rules or regulations available for the issuance and sale of such shares. Further, all Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to the Company's policy or policies, if any, concerning compliance with securities laws and regulations, as the same may be amended from time to time. 17. No Restriction on Corporate Action. Nothing contained in the Plan shall be construed to prevent the Company or any subsidiary from taking any corporate action which is deemed by the Company or such subsidiary to be appropriate or in its best interest, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect on the Plan or any award made under the Plan. No employee, beneficiary or other person shall have any claim against the Company or any subsidiary as a result of any such action. EXECUTED this _____ day of ______________, 2007. PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY By: _______________________________________ Mark Berg Executive Vice President and General Counsel